The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
Such was the condition of France when the assembly of Notables met
at St. Germains. The Chancellor L’Hopital, who had been growing more
tolerant every day, addressed them in a speech full of eloquence and
sound sense. He called their attention to the actual state of the
Huguenots, their number, and their strength; and showed the injustice
and impolicy of those who wished the king to put himself at the head
of one part of his subjects, and establish peace by the destruction of
the other. “In such a war,” he continued, “where is the king to find
soldiers? Among his subjects. Against whom is he to lead them? Against
his subjects. A triumph or a defeat is equally the destruction of his
subjects. I resign controversies on religion to the theologians; our
business is not to settle articles of faith, but to regulate the state.
A man may be a good subject without being a Catholic. I see no reason
why we should not live in peace with those who do not observe the same
religious ceremonies as ourselves.”
After a long and warm discussion the opinions of the Moderate or
“political” party triumphed, and sixteen articles were drawn up, which
became the basis of the celebrated Edict of January, 1562. It suspended
all preceding edicts, and authorized “those of the religion” to
assemble unarmed outside the towns to preach, pray, and perform other
religious exercises. By this means it was hoped to avoid collision
with the Catholics. The edict farther stipulated that the Protestants
should restore the churches and other ecclesiastical property they
had seized; that they should not resist the collection of tithes, or
criticise the ceremonies of the Catholic religion in their sermons,
books, or conversation. They were also forbidden to hold synods without
the permission of the crown, or to travel from town to town to preach,
but were to confine themselves to one church. As a natural corollary
Catholic preachers were likewise enjoined to abstain from invectives,
“as things serving rather to excite the people to sedition than
persuade them to devotion.” The various Parliaments at first refused
to register the edict, without which ceremony it would not have the
force of law; but their opposition was overcome in every instance
except that of Dijon, where it was “virtuously resisted” by Gaspard
de Saulx-Tavannes, lieutenant-general of Burgundy, a stanch partisan
of the Guises, and one of the most sanguinary leaders of the age. The
Parliament of Paris was characteristically obstinate. To the first
summons they replied, _Nec possumus nec debemus_; and when they
yielded at last to a threat of physical force, they would only register
the edict under protest, “considering the urgent necessity of a
temporary measure.” The Cardinal of Lorraine accepted it, acknowledging
to Throckmorton that some reformation was necessary, but he seemed to
think that the reform should come from above, and not from “men of
their own authority.”[269]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account