The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
The Cardinal of Lorraine and the Duke of Guise had retired from the
Privy Council in December, in order that they might take no part in
deliberations in which they knew the majority would be against them.
Such a silent protest added largely to their popularity, and they
were already looked upon as the heads of an anti-Huguenot league.
They placed orthodoxy before loyalty, and were ready to oppose the
crown whenever it showed any toleration to heretics. Nearly twelve
months before this date the duke had told the queen-mother in answer
to her question, that the Catholics would not obey the king if he
changed his religion. Still there are good reasons to believe that all
would have gone on quietly but for the defection of the weak-minded
Anthony of Navarre, whose ruling passion was to change his nominal
sovereignty of Navarre for a real crown and real subjects. The Guises
played upon this weakness; Philip II. gave him a choice of several
thrones; and the pope’s legate “very cleverly” offered to divorce him
from his excellent wife Joan of Albret, so that he might marry the
widowed Mary Stuart. But there was one condition: he must apostatize.
By such a man as Anthony, who had no principle, that little obstacle
was soon surmounted; and in February, 1562, he sold himself to the
enemy. Davila’s language leaves no doubt as to the motives of his
conversion.[270]
Anthony’s secession brought a great increase of power to the side of
the Triumvirate by placing at their disposal the troops that obeyed
him as lieutenant-general of France. The insolence of the Guises
increased with success. Their pride and contempt for all who did not
belong to their family or dependents almost bordered on insanity.
They could brook no opposition, and that the Huguenots should think
for themselves was a crime to be expiated only by death. They aimed
at political supremacy, and Coligny, now the acknowledged Huguenot
chief, though Condé was the nominal head, stood in the way of their
ambition. The Triumvirate, therefore, decided upon carrying matters to
extremity, and willingly accepted the aid proffered them by the King
of Spain. Philip II., the self-constituted champion of Romanism, the
“démon du midi,”[271] was trying to crush the Reform in Flanders by
a persecution unparalleled for its merciless severity in the history
of the world. He saw clearly that if France were reformed, or even
if the Reformers were tolerated, success would be impossible; and he
had therefore instructed his embassador, Chantonnay, as early as the
16th October, 1561, to tell the regent that if religious matters were
not arranged--by which he meant, unless the late proscriptions were
renewed--he would send troops to the aid of the Catholics. Catherine
was not the woman to submit to such an unsolicited intervention, even
at the hands of her royal son-in-law, and she answered the ambassador
haughtily, that “she did not know what his Spanish Majesty meant, but
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account