The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
brother answered; “it is the Bible.” It was probably the one used in
public worship. “S’blood! how is that? This book has only been printed
a year, and they say the Bible is more than fifteen hundred years old.”
“My brother is mistaken,” quietly observed the cardinal, as he turned
away to hide a smile of contempt at the duke’s ignorance.[278]
The news of the “blood-bath of Vassy” spread like wild-fire through
France, everywhere creating the deepest agitation. Such an outrage was
not only an infringement of the Edict of January, the ink of which
was scarcely dry, but a direct defiance of it; the act (as it were)
of a man who, in pursuance of his own ends, had resolved to trample
upon all law.[279] If the offense were not punished, no one would be
safe hereafter; no law would be binding. As soon as the tidings of
the massacre reached Paris, Marshal Montmorency, the governor, who
was not unfriendly to the Huguenots, advised the ministers to adjourn
their preachings for a few days, lest there should be a riot; but with
characteristic obstinacy they refused, as it would be “acknowledging
they were in the wrong.” They farther asked for a guard to protect them
in their ministrations. Meanwhile Beza went to Monceaux, and appealed
personally to the queen-regent. The apostate Anthony of Navarre
attempted to defend the Duke, and, throwing the blame on the Huguenots,
said that Beza ought to be hanged.[280] Beza replied that the Church of
Christ was more apt to receive blows than to inflict them, adding, in
words that have since passed into a proverb, “Remember, Sire, it is an
anvil on which many a hammer has been broken.” The queen-mother made a
gracious answer, and promised that the edict should be enforced. She
bade Navarre watch over the safety of the king, and summoned Guise to
court, “unattended by any men-at-arms.” Marshal St. André was ordered
to repair to his government at Lyons, but refused to go.
The excitement was so great in Paris that each party took up arms,
declaring they did so in self-defense; and had there been a reckless
leader on either side, the streets would have run with blood shed in
civil strife. The hotels of Montmorency and of Guise were turned into
fortresses, and strongly garrisoned by their respective partisans. The
constable, as representative of the oldest barony of France, was urged
by his wife to act up to his motto, and defend the faith; and he would
possibly have been induced to adopt an extreme course but for his son
Marshal Montmorency, who advised moderation, and urged that it would be
wiser to conciliate the queen-mother than attempt to coerce her.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account