The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
While the events we have described in the preceding chapter were taking
place in the north and west of France, the rest of that beautiful land
was a prey to anarchy and all the direst evils of civil war. In our
favored country, where internecine strife has been so long unknown, and
where, even in its worst days, Englishmen never forgot that they were
brothers, we can hardly picture to ourselves the frightful condition of
France during the whole reign of Charles IX. A few scattered incidents
must be taken as a sample of the hideous mass of horrors: to repeat
a tenth part of them would sicken and disgust the least sensitive of
readers.
Foremost among the blood-stained heroes of these cruel scenes are two
personages, distinct yet alike, to whom no parallel can be found except
in the sanguinary butchers of the Revolution of 1789. They are Montluc
and Des Adrets.
Blaise de Montluc had distinguished himself in the Italian wars of
Francis I. He had been made prisoner at Pavia, and had decided the
wavering fortunes of Cerisoles. As lieutenant of Guyenne he was
ordered to reduce that province to submission, and he did it in a very
characteristic manner, putting his Huguenot prisoners to death without
permitting them to say a word, “for they have golden tongues.” Terror
was his great weapon, and he used to boast that any one could know
which way he had passed by the “marks” he left upon the trees by the
roadside, adding, with a grim smile, that “one man hanging frightens
more than a hundred slain.” His “Commentaries,” an autobiographical
sketch, which he composed when years and disease prevented his using
the sword any longer, are a curious illustration of the state of mind
to which a man can be brought who makes mere military discipline the
principle of his actions. Reform was insubordination; “obedience to
the king’s edict or death”--he allowed no middle course. One day
he hanged six prisoners without a minute’s delay. “Why,” said the
terrified neighbors when they heard of it, “he puts men to death
without trial.” What need of trial? he would have replied; you are
in arms against the king. At St. Mezard four prisoners were brought
before him as he stood in the church-yard, his two executioners behind
him with their swords drawn; they always accompanied him, with cords
and other implements of their office. One of the prisoners was charged
with seditious language. Montluc caught him violently by the throat:
“Rascal, how dare you insult the king with your ribald tongue?” “Mercy,
mercy!” cried the man. “What! expect me to spare you when you have
not spared your king!” And, in a towering passion, Montluc threw the
poor wretch to the ground, his head falling on a broken monument.
“Strike, scoundrel!” roared Blaise to one of his executioners; and
at the word the sword fell, decapitating the man, and chipping a
fragment of stone from the slab. Two others were hanged on a tree hard
by, and the fourth was scourged so severely that he died a few days
after.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account