The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
On the other hand, the Catholics had their complaints. At Pamiers the
Huguenots attacked a procession, killed some of the clergy and burned
their houses.[379] At Soissons they pillaged the churches, demolished
the beautiful painted windows, broke the organ, melted the bells,
stripped the lead off the roofs, plundered the shrines of their gold
and jewels, burned the relics of the saints, and tore up the charters
and title-deeds belonging to the clergy. Similar tumults occurred at
Montauban and other towns. Where the Catholics were the strongest, they
fell upon the Huguenots; where the latter, they attacked the Catholics.
At one time there is a rumor of an attempt to assassinate the king; at
another, of an atrocious book ascribed to Sureau, a Protestant pastor,
in which the doctrine is boldly affirmed that “it is lawful to slay a
king or a queen who resists the Gospel Reformation.” Then an anonymous
letter is found at the door of Catherine’s bed-chamber, threatening her
with the fate of President Minard and the Duke of Guise, unless she
permits complete liberty of conscience to the Reformed party.
Many of the atrocities we have recorded were owing to the weakness
of the central government. It must be remembered that the several
provinces of France were under their own governors, who held their
offices by an almost hereditary right, and that the king had not always
the power, even when he had the inclination, to preserve peace. There
were few like that rough warrior Montluc, who kept Gascony so quiet
that for three years “horseman or footman did not steal so much as a
pullet.” He hanged two Catholic soldiers for infringing the edict,
and two Huguenots who had committed a similar offense “were shortly
strung up to keep the others company.” And he continues: “When these
good people saw that neither one side nor the other would meet with any
indulgence if they transgressed, they began to like and associate with
one another. I believe if every one had done the same, without favor to
either side, we should never have had so many troubles.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account