The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX — John Shaqi
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
Robert Etienne (or Stephens, as he is called by English scholars) was
more fortunate than Dolet. Up to the age of twenty-five he continued
in the Romish Church, professing a doubtful sort of orthodoxy, like
many other celebrated men of that day; and it is probable that he
would have continued in this undecided equivocal state all his life,
but for the virulent attacks made upon him by certain theologians, who
were violent in proportion to their stupidity. His quarrel with the
Sorbonne began as early as 1523, when that same body, which in 1470 had
invited the first printers to Paris, took alarm at the agitation of
men’s minds and turned fiercely against its own work. The presumption
of a young man, and he a layman, to correct a text of Scripture, seemed
monstrous. The publication of his Latin Bibles in 1528 and 1532, and
more especially that of the small portable Bible in 1534, aggravated
their hostility. But all this was as nothing to the rage excited by his
edition of the Latin Bible in 1545, wherein he had collected the notes
of that learned professor of Hebrew, Francis Vatable. In these notes
the active inquisitors of the Sorbonne found a number of heretical
propositions, such as a denial of the existence of purgatory, of the
efficaciousness of confession, and so forth. Hitherto Robert had
been able to escape the fate of his heterodox brother Dolet, through
the intervention of the king and the influence of John du Bellay and
others. But against this last tempest the royal authority seemed
powerless. The Faculty of Theology instituted proceedings against him,
when, unhappily for him, Francis I. died; and although Robert Etienne
found an equally kind patron in his successor, the character of the new
king was more impressionable. The Sorbonne attacked him more violently,
and foreseeing that Henry would be unable to protect him, he quitted
France, as Clement Marot, Olivetan, Amyot, and most of the professors
of the Royal College had done before him. Beza tells us that all
learning was suspected, and that hence many good but learned Catholics
were numbered among the heretics. A man was liable to be condemned for
not lifting his cap on passing an image (and they were at the corner
of almost every street), for not kneeling at the sound of the _Ave
Maria_ bell, and for eating meat on fast days. Clement Marot was
sent to prison and narrowly escaped burning for eating some bacon
during Lent.
Ils vinrent à mon logement:
Lors se va dire un gros paillard,
Par là, morbleu, voilà Clement,
Prenez-le, il a mangé le lard!
The fasting, or not fasting, on certain days soon became a test of
orthodoxy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account