The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
The great object of the _Politicians_ who had brought about the
Treaty of St. Germains, was to make France independent at home and
respected abroad; above all things, to get rid of Spanish influence
in their domestic affairs. That patriotic party knew well how Philip
II. had fomented their civil dissensions,[474] and they saw that a
long continuance of peace was hopeless unless the foreign intriguers
could be got rid of. The king himself had a glimpse of this truth, and
was besides very jealous of the position assumed by his brother of
Anjou. The queen-mother also expressed her dislike of the attitude
taken by Philip; but she was so thoroughly false that no reliance could
be placed upon any thing she said. It is not necessary to go back
to the Treaty of Cateau-Cambresis in 1559, which contained nothing
particularly humiliating, and had been condoned by the subsequent
intercourse between the two countries, although it must have been very
galling to French pride--as indeed to the pride of any nation--to
surrender its conquests. The active interference of Spain in the
politics of France began with the criminal intrigues of the house
of Lorraine. Their fanatical and spurious orthodoxy was, as we have
seen, ardently supported by Philip II., who never ceased personally,
or through his embassador, to urge the complete destruction of the
Huguenots. He even went so far, on more than one occasion, as to
threaten war, if the court made any concession to the heretics. We
have seen the result: France had been rent in pieces by civil war, and
Protestantism was as strong as ever. To this Spain had brought them:
might it not be possible, by reversing the policy, to reverse the
results? The opportunity was not unfavorable, and there were grievances
to be redressed. The Flemings were still in open revolt: the cruelties
of the blood-thirsty Alva had given an intensity to their hatred,
which nothing but total extermination could subdue. It would not be
prudent to allow the duke to go too far, and if by a word from France
the insurgents could be stimulated to farther sacrifices, Philip II.
would be so weakened that he would cease to be a dangerous neighbor. It
must not be forgotten that Spain was at this time the first power in
Europe. The successes of Alva, the expulsion of the Moors, the victory
of Lepanto, and the conquests in Northern Africa, showed that her vigor
was undiminished; and though her humiliation was at hand, nothing at
this time indicated any failure of her resources. It was the image of
Daniel: gold, silver, brass, and iron, but with feet of clay; and the
small stone destined to smite it was one of the smallest powers in
Europe. Had France seen her own true interest, she, and not England,
might “have become a great mountain and filled the whole earth.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account