The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
The Venetian embassador, Correro, writing on the prospect of war with
Spain, represents, as one of the many grounds of hatred between the
Spaniards and the French, that Flanders naturally belongs to France,
and that a campaign to recover it would give employment to the cadets
of the noble families. It would not cost a drop of blood, if France
were only to promise “the same liberty of conscience which her own
subjects enjoyed.” Add to this, Charles was offended: “Spain seemeth to
set the king here very light, which engendreth in him a great desire of
revenge, but lacketh treasure to make open demonstration thereof.”[475]
These were the ideas, not of Protestants only, but of undoubted
Catholics, men of whose orthodoxy there can be no suspicion. L’Hopital
had once been the directing spirit of this moderate party; but, since
his retirement from public life, Marshal Francis Montmorency, eldest
son of the constable, became their leader. Philip knew him well, and
feared him as the most formidable of his enemies in France. He was
seconded by his brother Damville, by Cossé, Biron, and others. It
was Montmorency who (according to Tavannes) had saved the Huguenots
at Moncontour by preventing the victory from being followed up; and,
according to Walsingham, the Peace of St. Germains was his work. By
the mere force of personal character, he had become a very influential
man, and Charles showed him the greatest affection. One day, when the
king had visited him at his castle of Chantilly, he told his royal
master that there could be no lasting peace, unless Protestants and
Catholics could be persuaded to live together in harmony: that, or the
extermination of one of the parties, was the only alternative. But how
was the present hostile state of things to be remedied? By uniting both
parties against their common enemy, Spain.[476] It is not known with
whom the idea arose, whether with Montmorency or Cossé; but it was
eagerly taken up by the king, who hoped in the coming war to gather
laurels that would shame those won by his brother of Anjou.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account