The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
Just at this juncture the queen-mother happened to be in Lorraine
tending her sick daughter, and the news of the martial outburst brought
her back in haste to Paris. She was too wise to oppose her son’s
warlike humor openly, but she so far shook his resolution as to have
the whole subject brought before the council. She was adverse to the
war on many grounds, but principally because she felt assured that if
Coligny carried on a successful campaign, his influence with the king
would quite supersede her own. She did not know how far the king and
the admiral had gone already. The latter, who was always with Charles,
even to a late hour, wrote on the 11th August to Prince William of
Orange, that there could be no doubt as to the king’s earnestness
(Walsingham says: “But for the king, all had quailed long before”),
and that he hoped in a few days to come to his help with 12,000
arquebusiers and 3000 cavalry. Yet only one day before this, Walsingham
wrote home: “Commonly it is given out that the king will no more
meddle, ... yet I am assured that underhand he is content there shall
[be] somewhat done, for that he seeth the peril that will befall unto
him, if the Prince of Orange quail.” The English embassador’s means of
information were so complete, that he actually knew more of what was
going on in the cabinet than the admiral did.
The extreme Catholic party had rallied and were trying every thing in
their power to destroy the Huguenot ascendancy at court, and Charles’s
resolution fluctuated from day to day. That he might enjoy a little
quiet, he suddenly started for Montpipeau, a pleasant hunting-lodge,
intending to remain there until the eve of his sister’s marriage.
Meanwhile bad news reached the French court; Catherine discovered that
Queen Elizabeth was playing her false, and while pretending zeal for
an alliance against Spain, was actually treating with that power. De
Foix and Fénelon both wrote from private information that she had been
advised to recall her troops from Flanders and not quarrel with Spain.
“Whereupon,” writes Walsingham, on the 10th August, “the queen-mother
fell into such fear that the enterprise must necessarily fail without
the aid of England.”[539] The report was untrue, and was probably a
mere invention of some of the traitors in the English council.[540] But
it frightened Catherine, and she determined to make one more attempt to
recover her ascendancy over the king. She hurried to Montpipeau with
such impetuous haste that two of her horses fell dead on the road.
With tears in her eyes, she accused Charles of ingratitude to a mother
“who had sacrificed herself for his welfare and incurred every risk
for his advantage.” “You hide yourself from me,” she continued, “and
take counsel with my enemies. You are about to plunge your kingdom into
a war with Spain, and yet England, in whose alliance you trusted, is
false to you. Alone you can not resist so powerful an enemy. You will
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account