The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
and one of her contemporaries, adopting the words of Quintus Curtius,
speaks of her as possessing _nil muliebre nisi sexum_ (nothing in
common with her sex except the name of woman). After her conversion,
she devoted all her energies to the propagation of the Reformed
faith, even (it is said) to the extent of preaching, though the
strongest evidence that she ever ascended the pulpit is a doubtful
contemporaneous caricature. Queen Elizabeth was as much attached to
her as her vain and selfish nature permitted. Henry, fully alive
to the importance of keeping up this friendship, wrote to announce
his mother’s death, and to request a continuance of her friendship:
“Entertaining the same desire which the late queen, my mother, always
manifested toward you, I most humbly entreat you will impart to me that
friendship and kindness which you always showed her, and the effects
of which we have known in so many instances that I shall always feel
myself your debtor, which I will testify in every thing you may be
pleased to command me to obey and do service, whenever I have the
power.”[546]
The queen’s death increased the distrust with which many of the
Huguenot party looked upon the demonstrations and favors of the court.
From every quarter the admiral continued to receive cautions and
warnings of treachery; but firm in his own integrity and good faith,
he put them all aside.[547] Many of his friends urged him to be on his
guard. The people of La Rochelle sent him more than one address on the
rumors that were abroad and on the suspicious aspect of affairs; but
he told them there was no occasion to fear (7th August). Another time
he made answer: “A man would never be at ease, if he interpreted every
action to his own disadvantage. It would be better to die a hundred
times than live in constant apprehension. I am tired of such alarms,
and have lived long enough.” To others who advised him to leave Paris,
he said: “By so doing I must show either fear or distrust. My honor
would be injured by the one, the king by the other. I should be again
obliged to have recourse to a civil war; and I would rather die a
thousand deaths than see again the miseries I have seen, and suffer
the distress I have already suffered.” Another time he said: “I can
not leave without plunging the country into fresh wars. I would rather
be dragged through the gutters than resort to such extremity.” An
intercepted letter from Cardinal Pelvé to the Cardinal of Lorraine, who
had just departed for Rome, was brought to him. He read in it: “There
are great hopes of success in the enterprise; the admiral suspects
nothing; the war with Flanders is a mere trick; the King of Spain knows
all about it.” The letter was manifestly a forgery--a device to prevent
the marriage, and the admiral treated it with contempt. Many of the
warnings he received were like prophetic dreams--remembered only when
the event confirms their forecastings. How could a man of such a noble
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account