The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
and generous character be suspicious when his royal master was treating
him with so much kindness and deference! Charles had learned at last
that Philip was continually intriguing and fomenting disturbances in
France. He was not so blind as his mother thought him: with all her
art, she could not effectually repress those generous flashes which
from time to time burst out only to make us regret that a better
education had not fitted Charles for his royal station. When he wrote
inviting the admiral to leave Chatillon and come to Paris, the latter
declined on account of the hostility of the citizens. “You have no
cause to fear,” replied the king; “they will attempt nothing against
my will.” At the same time he ordered Marcel, the provost of the
merchants, to see that there was no “scandal” (disturbance) on account
of the admiral’s arrival, or he would be answerable for it.
Coligny had need of all his patience and all his loyalty. What he built
up one day the queen-mother pulled down the next. Catherine told the
Venetian envoy, Giovanni Michieli, that she would not go to war against
Spain unless Philip compelled her: “Assure their lordships of Venice,”
she added, “that not only my words but my acts shall prove the firmness
of my resolutions.”[548] In a few hours, as we have seen, Catherine had
recovered her empire over her son, who, though physically brave, had
no moral courage, and could not bring himself to tell the admiral of
his altered purposes. No one else would venture to do so, and it was
therefore suggested that, in consequence of certain intelligence which
the king had received, Coligny should be requested to lay his plans
before a committee of the council (consisting of Montpensier, Louis of
Gonzaga, Cossé, and others), who were certain to condemn them. They
unanimously opposed the war, and after ineffectually trying to bend
the king, he turned to the queen-mother, and said: “Madam, the king
refuses to enter upon a war with Spain. God grant he may not be engaged
in another which he may perhaps find it not so easy to renounce.”[549]
This, which is the language of disappointed hopes, sounded very like a
threat, and there may probably have been a bitterness in his tone that
gave a meaning to his words he never intended they should bear. He only
meant, what he had often said before, that the best mode of healing the
wounds of the past wars would be to march the two parties side by side
to fight a common enemy. But his enemies put the worst construction on
his language, and his death was resolved on.[550] The king was very
impressionable: if he were suffered to consult with the admiral again,
the old ascendancy might be recovered, and would Coligny be inclined
to use his new power mercifully? The blow must be struck at once, but
first the union of the two families must be cemented by the marriage of
Henry and Margaret.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account