The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
The constable, foreseeing the change that was likely to take place in
the new reign, had profited by the last few days of the late king’s
life, to urge Anthony of Navarre to come to court and assert his rights
as prince of the blood to be one of the new council. A meeting of the
chiefs of the Bourbon, or opposition, party was accordingly summoned
at Vendome to decide on the line of conduct to be pursued. Condé,
Coligny, Andelot, the Vidame of Chartres (Francis of Vendome), and
Prince Porcien, all relations and friends, attended the summons. In the
interval the Guises had been installed in office, and the question now
arose, how their government should be resisted. Condé, Andelot, and the
Vidame were for war; the admiral advised delay, as the queen-mother
would be sure to join them, if she found securities on their side, and
in that case the government must fall. Moderate counsels prevailed, and
Anthony, after much vacillation, started for the court; but Francis II.
refused to see him except in the presence of his ministers, who offered
him every indignity. At length Condé joined him, and instilling some of
his own spirit into his brother, urged him to assert his claim. It was
granted after some little demur; but he was too much in the way, and
to get rid of him honorably he was commissioned to escort the Princess
Elizabeth to Spain. He fell into the trap so cunningly laid for him,
and the Guises were once more sole masters. Catherine was still
ostensibly consulted, and the royal edicts continued to run in this
form: “It being the good pleasure of my lady the queen-mother, We also
approving the things which she advises, are content and command that,”
etc.
Whatever little influence she possessed was exerted to drive her
late rival Diana from court, and force her to disgorge much of her
ill-gotten wealth. At her instance, the king wrote to the fallen
favorite: “That in consequence of her evil influence (mali officii)
over the late king his father, she deserved severe punishment; but,
in his royal clemency, he would trouble her no farther, but she must
return to him all the jewels that had been given her by the king his
father.”[103]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account