The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
The accession of the young king produced no amelioration in the
condition of the Lutherans. “In the midst of all these great matters
and business,” writes Throckmorton, “they here do not stay to make
persecution and sacrifice of poor souls. The 12th of this month [July]
two men and one woman were executed for religion.” This was a remnant
of the last reign. That the new reign would not be more tolerant was
shown by a proclamation issued the next day, “by sound of trumpet, that
all such as should speak either against the Church or the religion now
used in France, should be brought before the several bishops, and they
to do execution upon them.”[104] The edict of Villars-Cotteret (4th
September) forbade all “unlawful” meetings, whether by night or by day;
the houses in which such meetings were held were to be pulled down, and
the proprietors held to bail for their future good behavior. Another
edict (that of Blois, November, 1559) punished all who attended the
assemblies with death “without hope of pardon or mitigation.” By other
decrees (13th November) a reward of 100 crowns and a free pardon were
offered to any person who should give information of a secret meeting.
Nor were these severe measures confined to Paris. On 23d September,
1559, the magistrates of Poitiers issued an order forbidding religious
assemblies, enjoining all strangers to leave the town in twenty-four
hours, and innkeepers to send in lists of the lodgers in their houses.
There was to be no preaching in public or private, the citizens were
to give neither fire nor water to the pastors whom any body might
arrest, they were to be tried for sedition, and the lightest penalty
was confiscation of goods.[105] The result was that the country was
overrun with spies and informers, and the charge of heresy was often
made the means of gratifying private revenge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account