The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IXWhite, Henry
History
The massacre of St. Bartholomew : $b Preceded by a history of the religious wars in the reign of Charles IX
White, Henry
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Saint Bartholomew's Day, Massacre of, France, 1572
Although the Ordinance of Chambord (17th December, 1559), by
facilitating the trial of heretics and condemning to death all who
sheltered them, seemed intended to drive the Reformed to despair,
they as yet entertained no serious thoughts of rebellion. There were
not wanting men of their own class who preached the doctrine of
resistance,[115] yet none of the higher orders came forward as their
leaders. Without such champions they would be little better than an
undisciplined mob. At last, however, they found the man they wanted in
Bary de la Renaudie, a gentleman of a good family in Perigord, and a
soldier of some reputation--one of those daring men who always spring
up in troublous times. At one period attached to Francis of Guise, who
had helped him to escape from prison, he became his most violent enemy
in consequence of the duke’s barbarous cruelty to Gaspard de Heu, who
was allied to him by marriage.[116] Probably it was this enmity which
made him renounce his religion and join the Reformers. He was just
the man for getting up a conspiracy, and by his ability and address
soon won over great numbers in Switzerland as well as in France. He
constantly asserted that Calvin and Coligny approved of the design,
and that the Prince of Condé would declare himself at the proper
opportunity. As regards the two former, the statement is incorrect;
but Condé appears to have played an undecided part, “letting _I
dare not_ wait upon _I would_.”[117] The first meeting of the
conspirators was held at Nantes in February. It was a remote place, and
as the Parliament of Brittany was then assembled, their numbers would
not be noticed. In their articles or bond of agreement they swore to
respect the person of the king, but never to lay down their arms until
they had driven the Guises from power, brought them to trial (if not
worse),[118] and procured the suspension of every edict, both old and
new, against the Reformed, pending the assembly of the States-General.
Their plan was for each gentleman or captain, of whom there were
twenty, to collect a body of troops in his own district, and so to
arrange their march that they should all arrive at Blois at the same
time. The 6th of March was the appointed day, afterward changed to the
16th, when they hoped to find the Guises unprotected. It was an absurd
scheme, and could hardly fail to miscarry, even if it had not been
frustrated at the very outset by a circumstance which seems never to
have entered into the minds of the conspirators. The court removed from
the open town of Blois to the strong castle of Amboise on the Loire, in
accordance with arrangements which had been made some time before.[119]
That old royal residence had been forsaken by the court since the death
of Charles VIII. Its massive walls still tower boldly on the heights
above the river, and the cheerful little town clusters at their feet,
as if for protection. The Guises accompanied, or rather followed, the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account