Aristocracy (Social class) -- England -- Fiction; England -- Social conditions -- 19th century -- Fiction; Rich people -- Fiction
“I never would have left my mother,” she added, “but I could do
nothing. I was only the helpless spectator of a kind of effort which is
in my sight the most ignoble, the most foolish of all, the endeavor to
appear what one is not, and never can be.”
“You take it too much to heart,” said her companion. “You do not make
allowance for the times. Your people are only doing what every person
who has made money does on a small scale or a big scale, according to
their means. Mr. Massarene is immensely rich, and so his aspirations
are very large too.”
“Aspirations! To get on in society, to have great persons to dinner,
to represent in Parliament the interest of a constituency he had never
heard of a year ago, to get a title, though my brothers are all dead,
to entertain troops of people who scarcely know his name and have
hardly the decency to pretend to know it, do you call that aspiration?
It is more like degradation. Why cannot he remain in obscurity spending
his vast fortune for the good of others instead of squandering it on
idle people, impudent people, worthless people, people to whom he is a
jest, a by-word and a jeer?”
“My dear young lady, money is power,” said Lord Framlingham. “It is
nothing new that it should be so; but in other ages, it was subordinate
to many greater powers than itself. Now it is practically supreme;
it is practically alone. Aristocracy in its true sense exists no
longer. War in its modern form is wholly a question of supply. The
victory will go to who can pay most and longest. The religious orders,
once so absolute, are now timid anachronisms quaking before secular
governments. Science, which cannot move a step without funds, goes cap
in hand to the rich. Art has perished nearly. What is left of it does
the same thing as science. The Pope, who ought to be a purely spiritual
power, is mendicant and begs like Belisarius. What remains? Nothing
except trade, and trade cannot oppose wealth, because it lives solely
through it. For this reason, money, mere money, with no other qualities
or attractions behind it, is omnipotent now as it never was before in
the history of the world. It is not one person or set of persons who is
responsible for this. It is the tendency of the age, an age which is
essentially mercenary and is very little else! In politics, as in war
and in science, there is no moving a step without money and much money.
The least corrupt election costs a large outlay. Royalty recognizing
that money is stronger than itself, courts men of money, borrows from
them, and puts out in foreign stocks where it borrows as a reserve
fund against exile. You see there is no power left which can, or dare,
attempt to oppose the undisputed sway of money. A great evil, you say?
No doubt.”
She sighed; she recognized the truth of all he said; but she loathed
the fact she was compelled by her reason to acknowledge.
“‘When she’s convinced against her will
She’s of the same opinion still,’”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account