Adventure stories; Countesses -- Fiction; Lawyers -- Fiction; London (England) -- Fiction; Love stories; Trials (Murder) -- Fiction
“Yes, but with an important link missing from the chain. You see a good
deal might have occurred between the moment of the Countess Alexia’s
leaving the room and the finding of what happened. No, my dear friends,
it looks very like what we all think it, but there is an important
section of the affair still covered in mystery.”
Greetland had made it his business to work up the subject; it was his
vocation to be glib and authoritative on every likely topic of the day.
“The Countess’s position is not exactly enviable,” a man suggested.
“It is utterly and entirely odious,” Greetland agreed. “One scarcely
likes to believe the thing of her; she is such a charming girl. Yes;
one is horribly sorry for her. Without forgetting the dictum _de
mortois_, one may hazard the opinion that poor Reggie probably brought
the thing on himself and got no more than he deserved.”
“H’m!” There was a general pursing of lips as of men who felt
constrained to keep silence when it was in their minds to say much.
Restraint, however, was not a virtue which either character or
inclination encouraged Greetland to practise. “There was that affair of
Annabel Fancourt,” he remarked, in a low tone, as of those who discuss
the dead in their coffined presence.
“Behaved badly there, eh?” a man suggested, feeling his way carefully
along the fascinating path of scandal which leads directly away from
the above-mentioned dictum.
Greetland shook his head with a suggestion of unutterable condemnation.
“Ah; always understood so,” the other man proceeded, gaming boldness
since no one seemed inclined to protest. After all, it is often quite
as piquant to discuss the sins of the dead as of the living, and
actually does less harm--to them.
“Rather a bad lot,” another ventured.
“Always might be calculated on to go crooked with women,” the fourth
gossip supplemented.
“They always spoilt him. Injudicious blandishment has sent many a good
man wrong.”
“Women,” said Monty Vaxton who cultivated a reputation as a social
philosopher, “women can’t resist a gamble in love. That is why the
professional Philander always has his hands, or rather his arms, full.”
“At any rate they are optimists in the passion,” Jack Bellairs
remarked, “and they think they can succeed where other women have
failed; quite forgetting that they are playing for an elusive stake,
and where winning is, if possible, more disastrous than losing.”
“So you think,” said Hugh Lufton, who understood facts better than
theories, turning to Greetland, “that Countess Alexia was under the
influence of Martindale’s fascinations?”
Greetland shrugged. “It looks like it; though no one even suspected it.
But she is a clever girl.”
“Scarcely, if that were the case,” Vaxton objected.
“My dear Monty,” said the drawing-room sage, “no woman is clever in
love, although many are perfect geniuses in the matter of marriage.
When we talk of a clever woman we eliminate love from the question.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account