The Mathematical Theory of RelativityEddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Science
The Mathematical Theory of Relativity
Eddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Relativity (Physics)
Taking first $\alpha = 2$, the surviving terms are
\[
\frac{d^{2}x_{2}}{ds^{2}}
+ \{12, 2\}\, \frac{dx_{1}}{ds}\, \frac{dx_{2}}{ds}
+ \{21, 2\}\, \frac{dx_{2}}{ds}\, \frac{dx_{1}}{ds}
+ \{33, 2\}\, \frac{dx_{3}}{ds}\, \frac{dx_{3}}{ds} = 0,
\]
or using~\Eq{(38.5)}
\[
\frac{d^{2}\theta}{ds^{2}} + \frac{2}{r}\, \frac{dr}{ds}\, \frac{d\theta}{ds} - \cos\theta \sin\theta \left(\frac{d\phi}{ds}\right)^{2} = 0.
\Tag{(39.2)}
\]
Choose coordinates so that the particle moves initially in the plane $\theta = \frac{1}{2}\pi$.
Then $d\theta/ds = 0$ and $\cos\theta = 0$ initially, so that $d^{2}\theta/ds^{2} = 0$. The particle therefore
continues to move in this plane, and we may simplify the remaining
equations by putting $\theta = \frac{1}{2}\pi$ throughout. The equations for $\alpha = 1$, $3$,~$4$ are
found in like manner, viz.\
\begin{align*}
\frac{d^{2}r}{ds^{2}} + \tfrac{1}{2}\lambda' \left(\frac{dr}{ds}\right)^{2}
- re^{-\lambda} \left(\frac{d\phi}{ds}\right)^{2}
+ \tfrac{1}{2} e^{\nu-\lambda} \nu' \left(\frac{dt}{ds}\right)^{2}
&= 0,
\Tag{(39.31)}\displaybreak[0] \\
%\PageSep{86}
\frac{d^{2}\phi}{ds^{2}} + \frac{2}{r}\, \frac{dr}{ds}\, \frac{d\phi}{ds} &= 0,
\Tag{(39.32)}\displaybreak[0] \\
\frac{d^{2}t}{ds^{2}} + \nu'\, \frac{dr}{ds}\, \frac{dt}{ds} &= 0.
\Tag{(39.33)}
\end{align*}
The last two equations may be integrated immediately, giving
\begin{align*}
r^{2}\, \frac{d\phi}{ds} &= h,
\Tag{(39.41)}\displaybreak[0] \\
\frac{dt}{ds} &= ce^{-\nu} = c/\gamma,
\Tag{(39.42)}
\end{align*}
where $h$ and $c$ are constants of integration.
Instead of troubling to integrate~\Eq{(39.31)} we can use in place of it \Eq{(38.8)}
which plays here the part of an integral of energy. It gives
\[
\gamma^{-1} \left(\frac{dr}{ds}\right)^{2}
+ r^{2} \left(\frac{d\phi}{ds}\right)^{2}
- \gamma \left(\frac{dt}{ds}\right)^{2} = -1.
\Tag{(39.43)}
\]
Eliminating $dt$ and~$ds$ by means of \Eq{(39.41)} and~\Eq{(39.42)}
\[
\frac{1}{\gamma} \left(\frac{h}{r^{2}}\, \frac{dr}{d\phi}\right)^{2}
+ \frac{h^{2}}{r^{2}} - \frac{c^{2}}{\gamma} = -1,
\Tag{(39.44)}
\]
whence, multiplying through by~$\gamma$ or~$(1 - 2m/r)$,
\[
\left(\frac{h}{r^{2}}\, \frac{dr}{d\phi}\right)^{2}
+ \frac{h^{2}}{r^{2}} = c^{2} - 1 + \frac{2m}{r} + \frac{2m}{r} · \frac{h^{2}}{r^{2}},
\]
or writing $1/r = u$,
\[
\left(\frac{du}{d\phi}\right)^{2} + u^{2} = \frac{c^{2} - 1}{h^{2}} + \frac{2m}{h^{2}} u + 2mu^{3}.
\Tag{(39.5)}
\]
Differentiating with respect to~$\phi$, and removing the factor~$\dfrac{du}{d\phi}$,
\[
\frac{d^{2}u}{d\phi^{2}} + u = \frac{m}{h^{2}} + 3mu^{2},
\Tag{(39.61)}
\]
with
\[
r^{2}\, \frac{d\phi}{ds} = h.
\Tag{(39.62)}
\]
Compare these with the equations of a Newtonian orbit
\[
\frac{d^{2}u}{d\phi^{2}} + u = \frac{m}{h^{2}}
\Tag{(39.71)}
\]
with
\[
r^{2}\, \frac{d\phi}{dt} = h.
\Tag{(39.72)}
\]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account