The Mathematicall Praeface to Elements of Geometrie of Euclid of MegaraDee, John
Philosophy
The Mathematicall Praeface to Elements of Geometrie of Euclid of Megara
Dee, John
Geometry -- Early works to 1800; Mathematics -- Early works to 1800; Philosophy -- Early works to 1800
To our purpose. This _Iohn_, by one of his actes (besides many other:
both in England and Fraunce, by me, in him noted.) did disclose his
harty loue to vertuous Sciences: and his noble intent, to excell in
Martiall prowesse: When he, with humble request, and instant
Solliciting: got the best Rules (either in time past by Greke or
Romaine, or in our time vsed: and new Stratagemes therin deuised) for
ordring of all Companies, summes and Numbers of mẽ, (Many, or few) with
one kinde of weapon, or mo, appointed: with Artillery, or without: on
horsebacke, or on fote: to giue, or take onset: to seem many, being few:
to seem few, being many. To marche in battaile or Iornay: with many such
feates, to Foughten field, Skarmoush, or Ambushe appartaining:
[This noble Earle, dyed Anno. 1554. skarse of 24. yeares
of age: hauing no issue by his wife: Daughter to the Duke
of Somerset.]
And of all these, liuely designementes (most curiously) to be in velame
parchement described: with Notes & peculier markes, as the Arte
requireth: and all these Rules, and descriptions Arithmeticall, inclosed
in a riche Case of Gold, he vsed to weare about his necke: as his Iuell
most precious, and Counsaylour most trusty. Thus, _Arithmetike_, of him,
was shryned in gold: Of _Numbers_ frute, he had good hope. Now, Numbers
therfore innumerable, in _Numbers_ prayse, his shryne shall finde.
What nede I, (for farder profe to you) of the Scholemasters of Iustice,
to require testimony: how nedefull, how frutefull, how skillfull a thing
_Arithmetike_ is? I meane, the Lawyers of all sortes. Vndoubtedly, the
Ciuilians, can meruaylously declare: how, neither the Auncient Romaine
lawes, without good knowledge of _Numbers art_, can be perceiued: Nor
(Iustice in infinite Cases) without due proportion, (narrowly
considered,) is hable to be executed. How Iustly, & with great knowledge
of Arte, did _Papinianus_ institute a law of partition, and allowance,
betwene man and wife after a diuorce? But how _Accursius_, _Baldus_,
_Bartolus_, _Iason_, _Alexander_, and finally _Alciatus_, (being
otherwise, notably well learned) do iumble, gesse, and erre, from the
æquity, art and Intent of the lawmaker: _Arithmetike_ can detect, and
conuince: and clerely, make the truth to shine. Good _Bartolus_, tyred
in the examining & proportioning of the matter: and with _Accursius_
Glosse, much cumbred: burst out, and sayd: _Nulla est in toto libro, hac
glossa difficilior: Cuius computationem nec Scholastici nec Doctores
intelligunt. &c._ That is: +_In the whole booke, there is no Glosse
harder then this: Whose accoumpt or reckenyng, neither the Scholers, nor
the Doctours vnderstand. &c._+ What can they say of _Iulianus_ law, _Si
ita Scriptum. &c._ Of the Testators will iustly performing, betwene the
wife, Sonne and daughter? How can they perceiue the æquitie of
_Aphricanus_, _Arithmeticall_ Reckening, where he treateth of _Lex
Falcidia_? How can they deliuer him, from his Reprouers: and their
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account