The Matron's Manual of Midwifery, and the Diseases of Women During Pregnancy and in Childbed: Being a Familiar and Practical Treatise, More Especially Intended for the Instruction of Females Themselves, but Adapted Also for Popular Use among Students and Practitioners of MedicineHollick, Frederick
Science
The Matron's Manual of Midwifery, and the Diseases of Women During Pregnancy and in Childbed: Being a Familiar and Practical Treatise, More Especially Intended for the Instruction of Females Themselves, but Adapted Also for Popular Use among Students and Practitioners of Medicine
Hollick, Frederick
Chloroform; Gynecology; Indian Territory; Midwifery; Obstetrics; Pregnancy
It has often been a matter of dispute, both with medical men and with
moralists, whether _Men_ or _Women_ ought to assist in child-birth.
The discussion has called forth a great deal of declamation, but very
little has been said to the point on either side. It appears to me,
however, that the question may be very easily settled, if it be rightly
considered. The first requisite, and the most indispensable, in those
who are to assist in child birth is, that they should _know how to
assist_. This is paramount to every thing else. Now, if females really
did know what to do in such cases, and were fully competent to do it,
I think there is no question but they would be the _best_ assistants,
to say nothing of their being the most _proper_. There are many
things experienced by females in such situations, which can never be
understood by a man at all, though they are readily appreciated by one
of their own sex, particularly if she has been a mother herself. With
each other also there would be less disposition and less occasion for
reserve in delicate communications, and less repugnance to necessary
examination or manipulation, which could therefore be more efficiently
practised. In short, if women were undoubtedly equally competent with
men in this art, and full confidence was felt in them by their own sex,
I think it is evident they would, in every respect, be the most fitting
practitioners, and I have no doubt but they would be preferred. The
question simply arises then, whether they are so competent? And every
one able to judge, who speaks honestly, must admit that very few, if
any of them really are so. It has not been possible for them to acquire
the requisite information, nor to pursue the necessary investigations,
and therefore we cannot expect that they can be equal to those who
have. There are some women I know, who have been careful observers,
and who have had great experience, that can render all needful help _in
most cases_, but even they are apt to meet with difficulties, which
require more skill than they possess to overcome; therefore very few
like to depend upon them altogether. It is naturally argued that, as a
physician _may_ be needed, it is better to have him at first, and so be
ready for every contingency.
That females can make competent _Accoucheurs_ is proved by numerous
well known instances, among which I need only refer to MADAME
BOIVIN, and MADAME LACHAPELLE, both of whom, as practitioners and as
authors, stand in the very highest rank. These ladies are referred
to as authorities, and their works are quoted by the most eminent
Professors of the day; in fact, on many points, they have surpassed all
competitors. Further on in our work we shall have occasion to refer to
their labours, the value of which will then be seen.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account