The Maya Chronicles: Brinton's Library Of Aboriginal American Literature, Number 1
History
The Maya Chronicles: Brinton's Library Of Aboriginal American Literature, Number 1
Maya language -- Glossaries, vocabularies, etc.; Maya language -- Texts; Mayas -- Antiquities; Mayas -- History
In fact, the ancient name of Merida was not Ho, but _Ichcanzihoo_, as
appears from a later passage in Pech's narrative and from numerous
others in the Books of Chilan Balam. _Ho_ is only the abbreviation of
this long name. It appears to mean "The five (temples) of many
serpents." _Can_ is the generic term for serpent, and _ich_ used as a
prefix denotes a place where there is an abundance of what the noun
means: thus _ichche_=a place where the trees are tall and dense;
_ichxiu_, a place where the grass is tall and thick (_Diccionario de
Motul_). The serpents were probably those sculptured in stone or painted
on the walls. This theory receives additional probability from an entry
in the _Diccionario de Motul_, MS., which relates that the largest mound
in ancient Merida, situated back of the present convent of San
Francisco, was called by the natives _ahchuncan_, and that this was the
name of the idol which used to be worshiped there. Its signification
would be "the first or primitive serpent," or "the first speaker,"
_i. e._ oracle, as _can_ means both serpent and speech.
The temples at Ho were not in use when the Spaniards arrived, nor had
they been for many generations. Apparently only a few huts of wood and
straw made up the village, while these vast ruins were even then covered
to the summit with a heavy growth of timber in all respects like the
virgin forest around them. This is clearly stated by the Friar Lorenzo
de Bienvenida, who came to Merida in 1545. I quote his expressions from
a letter to the King in 1548:--
"La ciudad esta la tierra adentro treinta y tres leguas; llamase la
_ciudad de Merida_; pusieronle asi por los edificios superbos que hai en
ella, que en todo lo descubierto en Indias no se han hallado tan
superbos edificios, de canteria bien labrada, i grandes las piedras; no
hai memoria de quien los hizó; parecenos que se hicieron antes de la
venida de Christo porque tan grande estaba el monte encima dellos como
en lo bajo de la tierra; son altos de cinco estados de piedra seca i
encima los edificios, quatro quartos todo de celdas como de Frailes, de
veinte pies de luengo i de diez de ancho, i todas las portadas de una
piedra, lo alto de la puerta i de boveda, i destos hai en la tierra
otros muchos. Esta gente natural no habitaba en ellos, ni hacen casa
sino de paja y madera, habiendo mas apareja de cal i piedra que en todo
lo descubierto. En estos edificios tomamos sitio los Frailes para casa
de San Francisco; lo que habia sido cultura de demonios, justo es que
sea templo donde se sirve à Dios, etc." (_Carta de Fr. Lorenzo de
Bienvenida, 1548, MS._)
The date, 1511, given as that of the first arrival of the Spaniards,
refers to the shipwreck of Aguilar and his companions, who in that year
were thrown on the eastern coast.
This introductory paragraph was entirely miscontrued[TN-27] by Avila, and
nearly as much so by Brasseur. I add their translations to illustrate
this.
_Translation of Avila._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account