In every instance (except that of the chambered mound at Douglas) where
these implements were found in mounds they were placed quite
superficially at the summit of the mound; indeed at Benque Viejo, Seven
Hills, and Santa Rita it seems probable that they had not been buried
originally at all, but merely placed upon the summit of the mound and in
course of time became covered with a layer of humus from decaying
vegetation in the vicinity.
[Illustration: FIG. 49.--Flint objects from Tennessee.]
Similar flint objects have been found in other parts of the world,
notably at Brionio in Italy and in Stuart, Smith, and Humphrey Counties,
Tennessee. In figure 49, _b_-_n_, are shown somewhat rough outline
sketches of the Tennessee objects, and in figure 50, _a_-_p_, are
represented a selection of the most important objects found at Brionio,
now in the collection of the late Professor Giglioli at Florence. The
Tennessee objects are to be seen at Washington. The latter are small
when compared with the largest of the Maya specimens, but are neatly
chipped, whereas the Brionio objects are very crudely blocked out,
mostly from black flint.
It will be observed that figure 49, _c_, _d_, _g_, from Tennessee, shows
specimens almost identical with figure 50, _p_, from Brionio, and with
the turtle, pictured in plate 15, _g_, from the Douglas chambered mound;
again the spiked crescents, figure 50, _b_, _c_, _n_, from Brionio,
closely resemble the very much larger spiked crescent illustrated in
plate 15, _e_, from the Douglas chambered mound, and still more closely
the spiked crescent figured in "Flint Chips" (from Wilson, Prehistoric
Man, op. cit., p. 214). Though these objects are not found in Central
America outside the Maya area, the Aztec were sufficiently expert in the
art of flint and obsidian chipping to have produced them had they
wished. In figure 49, _a_, is seen the outline of a type of labret worn
by the Aztecs, chipped out of both flint and obsidian, which compares
favorably in workmanship with any of the objects from the Maya area.
In reviewing the evidence it would appear that these eccentrically
shaped objects were not employed either as implements or as weapons,
most of them being utterly unsuited in both size and shape for such
purposes; moreover, none of them show any signs of wear or use. Neither
were they used as ornaments, as many of them are too large and heavy,
while the more roughly chipped specimens would be quite unadapted for
such a purpose. Judging by the fact that 5 at least of the 11 separate
finds wore associated with human burials, it seems probable that these
objects were purely ceremonial in use; that they were most frequently,
if not invariably, buried with the dead, either on top of the
sepulchral mound, in close association with the corpse, or by the side
of a memorial stela; and that they were manufactured and used solely
for this purpose.
[Illustration: FIG. 50.--Flint objects from Italy.]
MOUND NO. 15
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account