The meaning of a liberal educationMartin, Everett Dean
Philosophy
The meaning of a liberal education
Martin, Everett Dean
Education
Speaking of the Reformation and its relation to science, Whitehead
says, “We cannot look upon it as introducing a new principle into human
life.” Perhaps he is inclined to over-emphasize the assertions of
the Reformers that they were only restoring what had been forgotten.
But he says, “It is quite otherwise with the rise of modern science.
In every way it contrasts with the contemporary religious movement.
The Reformation was a popular uprising and for a century and a half
drenched Europe in blood. The beginnings of the scientific movement
were confined to a minority among the intellectual élite.”
It is doubtless because the Humanists remained relatively indifferent
to science, that its early struggles with theology were comparatively
mild. It was permitted to make remarkable progress in the seventeenth
century without raising an issue too great for its strength. It is
interesting to note that when in the nineteenth century the conflict
of natural science with theology became acute, science was at the same
time engaged in a struggle for recognition by the official educational
system in which the classical tradition held sway.
The outstanding public champion of science in this conflict was Thomas
H. Huxley. He could say of university education in England in the year
1868, that the colleges no longer promoted research in science, and
were hardly more than “boarding schools for bigger boys.” Once they
had been homes for the life study of the most abstruse and important
branches of knowledge.
“I believe there can be no doubt that the foreigner who should wish
to become acquainted with the scientific, or the literary, activity
of modern England, would simply lose his time and his pains if he
visited our universities with that object.
“The countrymen of Grote and of Mill, of Faraday, of Robert Brown, of
Lyell, and Darwin, to go no further back than the contemporaries of
men of middle age, can afford to smile at such a suggestion. England
can show now, and she has been able to show in every generation
since civilization spread over the West, individual men who hold
their own against the world, and keep alive the old tradition of her
intellectual eminence.
“But in the majority of cases, these men are what they are in virtue
of their native intellectual force, and of a strength of character
which will not recognise impediments. They are not trained in the
courts of the Temple of Science, but storm the walls of that edifice
in all sorts of irregular ways, and with much loss of time and power,
in order to obtain their legitimate positions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account