We may still linger for a moment to observe how closely part of Anselm’s
nature was his proof of the existence of God.[349] It sprang directly from
his saintly soul and the compelling idealism of his reason. In the
_Monologion_ Anselm ranged his many arguments concerning the nature and
attributes of the _summum bonum_ which is God. Its chain of inductions
failed to satisfy him and his pupils. So he set his mind to seek a sole
and unconditioned proof (as Eadmer states in the _Vita_) of God’s
existence and the attributes which faith ascribes to Him. Anselm says the
same in the Preface to the _Proslogion_:
“Considering that the prior work was woven out of a concatenation of
many arguments, I set to seek within myself (_mecum_) whether I might
not discover one argument which needed nothing else than itself alone
for its proof; and which by itself might suffice to show that God
truly exists, and that He is the _summum bonum_ needing nothing else,
but needed by all things in order that they may exist and have
well-being (_ut sint et bene sint_); and whatever we believe
concerning the divine substance.”
The famous proof which at length flashed upon him is substantially this:
By very definition the word _God_ means the greatest conceivable being.
This conception exists even in the atheist’s mind, for he knows what is
meant by the words, the absolutely greatest. But the greatest cannot be in
the intellect alone, for then conceivably there would be a greater which
would exist in reality as well. And since, by definition, God is the
absolutely greatest, He must exist in reality as well as in the mind.[350]
Carrying out the scholia to this argument, Anselm then proves that God
possesses the various attributes ascribed to Him by the Christian Faith.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account