The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
History
The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)
Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
Drama, Medieval -- History and criticism; Theater -- History -- Medieval, 500-1500
as a name for the religious plays which he is condemning[528]. In the
fifteenth century, again, although ‘interlude’ is of course not one
of the commonest terms for a miracle-play, yet I find it used for
performances probably of the miracle-play type at New Romney in 1426 and
at Harling in 1452, while the jurats of the former place paid in 1463
for ‘the play of the interlude of our Lord’s Passion[529].’ The term,
then, appears to be equally applicable to every kind of drama known to
the Middle Ages. As to its philological derivation, both the _New English
Dictionary_ and Dr. Ward treat it as a _ludus_ performed in the intervals
of (_inter_) something else, although they do not agree as to what that
something else was. For the performance of farces ‘between the acts of
the long miracle-plays’ there is no English evidence whatever[530]. The
farcical episodes which find a place in the Towneley plays and elsewhere
are in no way structurally differentiated from the rest of the text.
There are some French examples of combined performances of farces and
miracles, but they do not go far enough back to explain the origin of
the word[531]. A certain support is no doubt given to the theory of
the _New English Dictionary_ by the ‘mirry interludes’ inserted in Sir
David Lyndsay’s morality _Ane Satyre of the Thrie Estaits_, but, once
more, it is difficult to elucidate a term which appears at the beginning
of the fourteenth century from an isolated use in the middle of the
sixteenth. Dr. Ward’s hypothesis is perhaps rather more plausible. No
doubt plays were performed at court and elsewhere between the banquet and
the ‘void’ or cup of spiced drink which followed later in the evening,
and possibly also between the courses of the banquet itself[532]. But
this fact would not differentiate dramatic _ludi_ from other forms of
minstrelsy coming in the same intervals, and the fact that miracle-plays
are called interludes, quite as early as anything else, remains to be
accounted for. I am inclined myself to think that the force of _inter_ in
the combination has been misunderstood, and that an _interludium_ is not
a _ludus_ in the intervals of something else, but a _ludus_ carried on
between (_inter_) two or more performers; in fact, a _ludus_ in dialogue.
The term would then apply primarily to any kind of dramatic performance
whatever.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account