The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
History
The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)
Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
Drama, Medieval -- History and criticism; Theater -- History -- Medieval, 500-1500
In spite of the difference of text the incidents of the Rouen and Limoges
versions, except for the angelic warning introduced at Rouen, are the
same. There was a dramatic advance when the visit to Jerusalem, instead
of being merely narrated by the choir, was inserted into the action.
In the play performed at Nevers[176], Herod himself, destined in the
fullness of time to become the protagonist of the Corpus Christi stage,
makes his first appearance. There are two versions of the Nevers play. In
the earlier the new scene is confined to a colloquy between Herod and the
_Magi_:
‘[_Magi._] Vidimus stellam eius in Oriente, et agnovimus regem
regum esse natum.
[_Herodes._] regem quem queritis natum stella quo signo
didicistis? Si illum regnare creditis, dicite nobis.
[_Magi._] illum natum esse didicimus in Oriente stella
monstrante.
[_Herodes._] ite et de puero diligenter investigate, et
inventum redeuntes mihi renuntiate.’
The later version adds two further episodes. In one a _nuntius_ announces
the coming of the _Magi_, and is sent to fetch them before Herod: in the
other Herod sends his courtiers for the scribes, who find a prophecy of
the birth of the Messiah in Bethlehem. Obviously the Herod scene gives
point to the words at the end of the Rouen play, in which the angel bids
the _Magi_ to return home by a different way.
At Compiègne the action closes with yet another scene, in which Herod
learns that the _Magi_ have escaped him[177].
‘_Nuncius._ Delusus es domine, magi viam redierunt aliam.
[_Herodes._ incendium meum ruina extinguam[178].]
_Armiger._ decerne, domine, vindicari iram tuam, et stricto
mucrone quaerere iube puerum, forte inter occisos occidetur et
ipse.
_Herodes._ indolis eximiae pueros fac ense perire.
_Angelus._ sinite parvulos venire ad me, talium est enim regnum
caelorum.’
In a Norman version which has the same incidents as the Compiègne play,
but in parts a different text, the _armiger_ is the son of Herod, and
the play ends with Herod taking a sword from a bystander and brandishing
it in the air[179]. Already he is beginning to tear a passion to tatters
in the manner that became traditionally connected with his name. Another
peculiarity of this Norman version is that the _Magi_ address Herod in an
outlandish jargon, which seems to contain fragments of Hebrew and Arabic
speech.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account