The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
History
The mediaeval stage, volume 2 (of 2)
Chambers, E. K. (Edmund Kerchever)
Drama, Medieval -- History and criticism; Theater -- History -- Medieval, 500-1500
The liturgical drama proper abstained in the main from any strictly
dramatic representation of the Passion. The nearest approach to such a
thing is in the dialogued versions of the _Planctus Mariae_ and in the
Benedictbeuern _Ludus breviter de Passione_, which extends very slightly
beyond these. The central event of the transition period is, therefore,
the growth side by side with the _Quem quaeritis_ of a Passion play,
which in the end rather absorbs than is absorbed by it. A marked advance
in this direction is shown in an Anglo-Norman fragment, probably written
in the twelfth century, which includes, not indeed the Crucifixion
itself, but the Descent from the Cross, the Healing of Longinus, and the
Burial of Christ[259]. The first recorded Passion play is in Italy. It
took place at Siena about 1200[260]. In 1244 the Passion and Resurrection
were played together at Padua[261]. The earliest text of a Passion play
is contained in the Benedictbeuern manuscript[262]. It opens with the
Calling of Andrew and Peter, the Healing of the Blind, Zacchaeus and the
Entry into Jerusalem. Then follows a long episode of Mary Magdalen. She
is represented with her lover, buying cosmetics of a _Mercator_—we have
had the _Mercator_ in the _Quem quaeritis_ and in the _Sponsus_—and with
a profane song upon her lips:
‘Mundi delectatio dulcis est et grata,
cuius conversatio suavis et ornata.’
She is converted in a dream, puts on black, buys ointments from the same
_Mercator_, and adores the Lord in the house of Simon. Then come, far
more briefly treated, the Raising of Lazarus, the Betrayal by Judas, the
Last Supper, the Mount of Olives, the Passion itself, from the Taking in
Gethsemane to the Crucifixion. The introduction here of some _planctus
Mariae_ points to the _genesis_ of the drama, which closes with the
Begging of the Body of Christ by Joseph of Arimathaea. And so, at a blow,
as it were, the content of the Easter play is doubled. Certain episodes,
such as the Conversion of Mary Magdalen and the Raising of Lazarus had,
as we know, received an independent dramatic treatment; but in the main
the play before us, or its source, bears the character of a deliberate
composition on the lines of the pre-existing _Quem quaeritis_. That it
was to be followed in representation by a _Quem quaeritis_ may perhaps
be taken for granted. Indeed there is one personage, the wife of the
_Mercator_, who is named in a list at the beginning, but has no part in
the text as it stands[263]. She may have come into the Benedictbeuern
_Quem quaeritis_, of which a fragment only survives, and this may have
been intended for use, as might be convenient, either with the _Ludus
breviter de Passione_, or with the longer text now under consideration.
At all events, Passion and Resurrection are treated together in two
slightly later texts, one from the south of France[264], the other from
St. Gall[265]. The St. Gall Passion play takes the action back to the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account