Cramp, Charles Henry, 1828-1913; Naval architects -- United States -- Biography
The departure of the “Cimbria” from Russia was a great event there, and
all the officers who left Russia on that expedition have continued ever
since to meet yearly on March 28 (O. S.), that being the date of their
departure from Russia. On March 29, 1898, twenty years afterward, Mr.
Cramp happened to be in Russia arranging for the contract between his
Company and the Russian government for the construction of the
battleship “Retvizan” and the cruiser “Variag.” A committee of officers
at the time called and invited him to be present at their annual banquet
as a guest. This committee was composed of some of the younger officers
who were on the “Cimbria” expedition. They stated that no guest had ever
been invited to one of these banquets, but they considered Mr. Cramp’s
connection with the fitting out of that fleet entitled him to the
distinction of being the only guest they ever had on one of those
occasions. He found there Vice-Admiral Avalan, the Assistant of the
Minister of Marine and now Minister of Marine,—he had been captain of
the “Asia;” Admiral Grippenburg, who had been captain of the “Europe;”
and also about thirty of the sixty officers who left on the “Cimbria” on
its first voyage. Of those absent, a great many had died, and some, of
course, were away. Admiral Alexeieff was in China.
Mr. Cramp had begun his overtures with a view to naval construction for
Russia as early as the fall of 1893. During that period the Russian
Atlantic fleet was present in our waters to take part in celebrating the
four hundredth anniversary of Columbus’ discovery. The Grand Duke
Alexander was an officer in that squadron, which during its stay in our
waters was at anchor for some time in the Delaware, and its officers
freely visited the shipyard, carefully inspecting and examining all the
work then going on. The general result was that they became enthusiastic
with regard to the development of the art in this country and with the
character of work being done toward the rebuilding of our navy, and they
were also profoundly impressed with the facilities of Cramps’ shipyard
which might be utilized for increase of the Russian navy. They frankly
said, however, that just at that moment it did not seem to be the policy
of their government to have important work done for the Russian navy in
foreign shipyards. This was, of course, true, for at that time Russia
was not building any kind of naval construction more important than
torpedo-boat destroyers outside of her own domain. During the following
years (1894, 1895, 1896) certain correspondence passed between Mr. Cramp
and high officials in the Russian Ministry of Marine; though little
progress was made during those years except to call the attention of the
Russians in a vivid and forceful manner to the capacities and facilities
which he controlled, and to strengthen the _entente cordiale_ which had
so long existed between the Russian naval authorities and himself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account