The Memoirs of François René Vicomte de Chateaubriand sometime Ambassador to England. volume 3 (of 6): Mémoires d'outre-tombe volume 3Chateaubriand, François-René, vicomte de
History
The Memoirs of François René Vicomte de Chateaubriand sometime Ambassador to England. volume 3 (of 6): Mémoires d'outre-tombe volume 3
Chateaubriand, François-René, vicomte de
Chateaubriand, François-René, vicomte de, 1768-1848
"Taking into consideration that, instead of reigning with a
sole view to the interest, the happiness and the glory of the
French people, according to the terms of his oath, Napoleon
has completed the misfortunes of the country by his refusal
to treat on conditions which the national interest obliged
him to accept and which did not compromise the honour of
France; by his abuse of all the means entrusted to him in men
and money; by his abandonment of the wounded without aid,
medical requisites, or supplies; by various measures which
resulted in the ruin of the towns, the depopulation of the
rural districts, famine and infectious disease;
"Taking into consideration that, owing to all these causes,
the Imperial Government established by the Senatus-Consultum
of the 28 Floréal Year XII., or 18 May 1804, has ceased to
exist, and that the manifest desires of all Frenchmen call
into being an order of things of which the first result would
be the restoration of general peace, and which would also
mark the epoch of a solemn reconciliation between all the
States of the great family of Europe, the Senate declares
and decrees as follows: Napoleon deposed from the throne;
hereditary right abolished in his family; the French people
and the army released from their oath of fidelity to him."
The Roman Senate was less harsh when it declared Nero a public enemy:
history is but a repetition of the same facts applied to varying men
and times.
Can one picture to one's self the Emperor reading this official
document at Fontainebleau? What must he have thought of what he had
done, and of the men whom he had summoned to be his accomplices in
his oppression of our liberties? When I published my pamphlet _De
Bonaparte et des Bourbons_, could I have expected to see it amplified
and converted into a decree of deposition by the Senate? What prevented
those legislators, in the days of prosperity, from discovering the
evils of which they reproached Bonaparte with being the author, from
perceiving that the Constitution had been violated? What zeal suddenly
seized these mutes for "the liberty of the press"? How did they, who
had overwhelmed Napoleon with adulation upon his return from each of
his wars, now come to find that he had undertaken those wars "only in
the interest of his own unmeasured ambition"? How did they, who had
flung him so many conscripts to devour, suddenly melt at the thought
of the wounded soldiers "abandoned without aid, medical requisites, or
supplies"? There are times at which contempt should be but frugally
dispensed, because of the large number of those in need of it: I pity
them for this moment, because they will need it again during and after
the Hundred Days.
[Sidenote: By the Decree of the Senate.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account