The Memoirs of François René Vicomte de Chateaubriand sometime Ambassador to England. volume 5 (of 6): Mémoires d'outre-tombe volume 5Chateaubriand, François-René, vicomte de
History
The Memoirs of François René Vicomte de Chateaubriand sometime Ambassador to England. volume 5 (of 6): Mémoires d'outre-tombe volume 5
Chateaubriand, François-René, vicomte de
Chateaubriand, François-René, vicomte de, 1768-1848
"But when, after a system of falsehood pursued to the last moment,
slavery was suddenly proclaimed; when the conspiracy of folly and
hypocrisy burst forth unawares; when the panic of the palace,
organized by eunuchs, was prepared as a substitute for the terror
of the republic and the iron yoke of the empire, then it was
that the people armed themselves with their courage and their
intelligence. It was found that those 'shopkeepers' could breathe
freely amid the smoke of gunpowder and that it required more than
'four soldiers and a corporal' to subdue them. A century could not
have ripened the destinies of a nation so completely as the three
last suns that have shone over France. A great crime was committed;
it produced the violent explosion of a powerful principle: was it
necessary, on account of this crime and the moral and political
triumph that resulted from it, to overthrow the established order
of things? Let us examine.
"Charles X. and his son have forfeited, or abdicated, the throne,
understand it which way you will; but the throne is not vacant:
after them came a child, whose innocence ought not to be condemned.
"What blood now rises against him? Will you venture to say that
it is that of his father? This orphan, educated in the schools of
his country, in the love of a constitutional government and with
the ideas of the age, would have become a king well suited to our
future wants. The guardian of his youth should have been made
to swear to the declaration on which you are about to vote; on
attaining his majority, the young Monarch would have renewed his
oath. In the meantime, the present King, the actual King would have
been M. le Duc d'Orléans, the regent of the kingdom, a Prince who
has lived among the people and who knows, that a monarchy, to-day
can only exist by consent and reason. This natural arrangement, as
it appears to me, would have united the means of reconciliation
and would perhaps have saved France those agitations which are the
consequence of all violent changes in a State.
"To say that this child, when separated from his masters, would
not have had time to forget their very names, before arriving
at manhood; to say that he would remain infatuated with certain
hereditary dogmas, after a long course of popular education, after
the terrible lesson which, in two nights, has hurled two kings from
the throne, is, at least, not very reasonable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account