The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
extraordinary and surprising result.
CH. VIII.—A Digression, demonstrating that when two great Princes meet
in order to adjust their Differences, such Interviews are generally more
prejudicial than profitable.
It is the highest act of imprudence for two great princes, provided
there is any equality in their power, to admit of an interview, unless
it be in their youth, when their minds are wholly engaged and taken up
with entertainments of mirth and pleasure; but when they are come to
years of emulation, though their persons should be in no danger (which
is almost impossible), yet their heart-burnings and animosities will
certainly augment. It were better, therefore, that they accommodated
their differences by the mediation of wise and faithful ministers, as I
have sufficiently instanced already in these my Memoirs; however, I will
give some examples of the like nature, which I have seen and known myself
in my own time.
Not many years after the coronation of our king, and just before the
confederacy called the Public Good, there was an interview between the
Kings of France and Castile[225], princes of the nearest alliance in
Christendom, for the kings are akin, their kingdoms almost contiguous,
and their subjects bound by oaths and execrations to preserve it
inviolable. To this interview Henry, King of Castile, came to Fontarabia,
very splendidly attended, and the King of France came to St. Jean de
Luz (about four leagues’ distance), and each of them was upon the very
borders of his kingdom. I was not present myself, but I had my relation
from the king, and from Monsieur du Lau, and it was confirmed to me
afterwards by several persons in Castile, who were then present with
their king, and particularly by the Grand Master of St. James[226], and
the Archbishop of Toledo[227], the two greatest persons in that kingdom
at that time. There were present also the Count of Lodesma[228] (that
king’s favourite) in great splendour, with his guards, consisting of
300 horse, all Moors of Granada, or Negroes. It is true, indeed, that
King Henry was a person of no great sense, for he had either given away
all his patrimony, or suffered it to be taken or embezzled by anybody
that had a mind to it. Our king was also well attended, according to
his custom, and his guards made a glorious appearance. The Queen of
Arragon[229] was present at that treaty, upon occasion of a difference
between her and the King of Castile about Estella, and some other places
in Navarre, of which difference the King of France was made umpire.[230]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account