The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
To continue our proposition, that interviews of great princes are not
necessary, you must know, these two kings had never had any quarrels,
neither was there the least difference between them; they saw one
another not above once or twice, upon the bank of a river[231] (which
parts the two kingdoms), near a little castle called Heurtebise, where
the King of Castile passed over to the other side; but they staid no
longer together than the Grand Master of St. James and the Archbishop
of Toledo thought good; which being observed by the King of France, he
desired their acquaintance, and they went to wait on him at St. Jean de
Luz. His majesty received them very honourably, and a mighty friendship
and intelligence was settled between them and the King of France, who
immediately began to dislike the King of Castile, and had but little
value and esteem for him. The greatest part of their attendants were
quartered at Bayonne, between whom several quarrels immediately arose
(notwithstanding the alliance); their languages also being different.
The Count of Lodesma passed the river in a boat, whose sail was of cloth
of gold; he was himself in a pair of buskins set thick with precious
stones, in which he went to wait upon the king; though he was not really
a count, yet he was very rich, and I saw him afterwards made Duke of
Albourg, and invested with great possessions in Castile. Several jests
and scoffs happened between these two nations, notwithstanding their
alliance. The King of Castile’s person was homely, and his dress did not
please the French, who laughed at and derided both. Our king wore a short
coat, as ill made as was possibly; sometimes he wore very coarse cloth,
and particularly then; his hat was old and differing from everybody’s
else, with an image of lead upon it. The Castilians laughed as heartily
at his dress, supposing it his stinginess. In short, the convention
broke up, and they parted, but with such scorn and contempt on both
sides, that the two kings never loved one another heartily afterwards;
and such quarrels and animosities arose in the court of Castile among
the courtiers, as continued to the king’s death, and a long time after.
I saw the king afterwards forsaken by all his servants, and the poorest
and most pitiable prince in the world. The Queen of Arragon was also much
dissatisfied with the sentence which the King of France had given in
favour of the King of Castile, and both she and the King of Arragon[232]
hated him for it ever after. It is true they made use of him against
the town of Barcelona afterwards in their extremity; but that friendship
lasted not long, for a war broke out between our king and the King of
Arragon, which lasted sixteen years and remains yet undetermined[233]:
but to give other examples.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account