The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
I have formerly[293] mentioned the reasons that prevailed with the
Duke of Burgundy to marry the sister of Edward, King of England, and
it was principally to strengthen his alliance against the King of
France; otherwise he would never have done it, for the love he bore to
the house of Lancaster, to which he was allied by his mother, who was
Infanta of Portugal, but her mother[294] was the Duke of Lancaster’s
daughter; wherefore his kindness for the house of Lancaster was as great
as his hatred to that of York. At the time of this marriage, the house
of Lancaster was quite depressed, and of the house of York there was
no great talk; for Edward, who was both Duke of York and King, enjoyed
the peaceable possession of the kingdom. In the war between these two
contending houses, there had been seven or eight[295] memorable battles
in England; in which threescore or fourscore persons of the blood-royal
of that kingdom were cruelly slain, as is said before in these Memoirs.
Those that survived were fugitives, and lived in the Duke of Burgundy’s
court; all of them young gentlemen (whose fathers had been slain in
England) whom the Duke of Burgundy had generously entertained before this
marriage, as his relations of the house of Lancaster. Some of them were
reduced to such extremity of want and poverty before the Duke of Burgundy
received them, that no common beggar could have been poorer. I saw one of
them, who was Duke of Exeter[296] (but he concealed his name), following
the Duke of Burgundy’s train bare-foot and bare-legged, begging his bread
from door to door. This person was the next of the house of Lancaster;
he had married King Edward’s sister, and being afterwards known, had
a small pension allowed him for his subsistence. There were also some
of the family of the Somersets[297], and several others, all of them
slain since, in the wars. The fathers and relations of these persons had
plundered and destroyed the greatest part of France, and possessed it for
several years, and afterwards they turned their swords upon themselves,
and killed one another; those who were remaining in England, and their
children, have died as you see; and yet there are those who affirm
that God does not punish men as he did in the days of the children of
Israel, but suffers the wickedness both of princes and people to remain
unpunished. I do believe, indeed, he does not speak and converse with
mankind as he did formerly; for he has left them examples enough in the
world to instruct them; but you may see, by the sequel of this discourse,
and by reflecting on what you know besides, that of those bad princes,
and others, who cruelly and tyrannically employ the power that is in
their hands, none, or but few of them, die unpunished, though, perhaps,
it is neither in the same manner, nor at the same time, that those who
are injured desire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account