The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
The king having received information of the constable’s departure,
resolved to attempt some action that might prevent his reconciliation
with the Duke of Burgundy; wherefore he marched with all expedition
towards St. Quentin[489], with a detachment of 700 or 800 men-at-arms,
whom he had assembled on a sudden, being privately advised of what number
of troops the garrison consisted. Upon the king’s approach, some of
the citizens came out to meet his majesty, and submitted themselves to
him. The king commanded me to enter the town, and order the garrison to
evacuate their quarters, which I did; and our men-at-arms having entered,
the king himself followed, and was well received by the inhabitants; upon
which some of the constable’s party fled after him into Hainault. As soon
as the king was in possession of St. Quentin, he immediately despatched
a courier with the news of it to the Duke of Burgundy, to let him
understand that all hope of recovering it by the constable’s interest was
now entirely lost. Upon receiving this news, the Duke of Burgundy sent
his commands to the Lord of Aimeries (his grand bailiff in Hainault) to
keep such guards in Mons that the constable might not escape, and in the
meantime to confine him to his house. The bailiff durst not disobey the
duke’s orders, yet his guards were not so strict but the constable might
have escaped if he had pleased.
What account can we give of Fortune in this place? This person was seated
between the territories of these rival princes; he was possessed of
several strong castles, had 400 men-at-arms well paid, and all his own
creatures, under his control, and had had the command of them a dozen
years: he was a person of great wisdom and valour, was very rich, and
had great experience; and yet none of all these powerful advantages
could, in the time of danger and distress, either afford him relief, or
inspire him with courage enough to attempt his escape. One may say (and
not without reason) that deceitful Fortune had assumed another air, and
begun to regard him with a frowning aspect: but alas! Fortune is nothing
but a poetical fiction; such surprising mysteries as these are far above
her power to effect; and, when I reflect upon what, has already been
said, and what may farther be urged, I cannot help thinking but that God
had forsaken him; and if it were no offence in any man to judge (which
it would be, and especially for me), I should maintain that the most
probable cause of all his misfortunes, was his restless endeavours and
designs to foment and continue the war between the king and the Duke of
Burgundy, upon which alone his authority and power depended; nor indeed
was this very difficult to accomplish, upon account of their humours and
dispositions, which were naturally in themselves so vastly different.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account