The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
That person would indeed be guilty of the greatest ignorance, who should
believe Fortune or Chance had such an influence over human affairs as to
force a man of his experience in the world, to incur the simultaneous
displeasure of two such mighty princes, who in their lives never agreed
in any one point but his ruin and destruction; and it would be more
astonishing still, that she should have created an enmity between him
and the King of England, who had married his niece[490], and had a great
value and respect for all his wife’s relations, and particularly for
those of the house of St. Paul. To speak impartially (neither can it be
otherwise), God had withdrawn His grace from him, or else he would never
have incensed these three powerful princes, and have managed his affairs
so ill as not to have one friend left that would give him a night’s
entertainment in his distress; so that God Himself was the Fortune that
did this: and as it has happened formerly, so it will happen to many
hereafter, who, after a long continuance of ease and prosperity, must
expect to fall into great misfortunes and adversity.
As soon as the king was informed of the constable’s being arrested in
Hainault by the Duke of Burgundy’s order, he sent to require the duke
either to deliver him up to him, or perform their agreement. The duke
promised he would, and accordingly he caused the constable to be removed
to Peronne, and placed a strong guard upon him. The Duke of Burgundy had
made himself master of several places in Lorraine and Barrois, and had
formally invested Nancy[491], which made a vigorous defence. The king
had a considerable army in Champagne, of which the duke was extremely
afraid; for by the truce he had no liberty to invade the Duke of
Lorraine’s territories, who had put himself under the king’s protection.
The Lord du Bouchage and the other ambassadors strongly pressed the Duke
of Burgundy to perform his agreement. The duke told them always he would,
and yet the eight days (by which time the constable was to be either
executed or delivered to the king) were expired a month since. At last,
finding himself hard pressed, and fearing the king might put a stop to
his conquests in Lorraine, which he extremely desired to complete, in
order to open a passage through Luxembourg into Burgundy, and join all
his territories together (for if this little duchy were once subdued,
he might go from Holland almost as far as Lyons, without leaving his
own dominions); for these reasons he wrote to his chancellor and to the
Lord of Humbercourt (both of them the constable’s inveterate enemies)
immediately to repair to Peronne, and on a certain day to deliver the
constable[492] to such ambassadors as the king should send to receive him
(for in the duke’s absence, they two had the administration of all his
affairs); and he sent the Lord of Aimeries orders to deliver him to them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account