The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
In the meantime the Duke of Burgundy vigorously pushed the siege of
Nancy, in which town there was a strong garrison that made a brave
defence. One of the Duke of Burgundy’s captains, called the Count of
Campobasso (born in Naples, but banished that kingdom upon account of
his having espoused the interest of the house of Anjou), had lately
entered into a correspondence[493] with the Duke of Lorraine (a near
relation and next heir to the house of Anjou, after the death of King
René[494], his maternal grandfather), and promised to prolong the siege
by not providing the army with ammunition, and other things that were
necessary for the taking of the town by force. It was indeed in his
power, for he was then a person of the greatest influence in the army,
and therefore his villany and perfidiousness to his master were the
greater, as you shall hear hereafter; and this was a kind of earnest
of all the misfortunes that happened afterwards to the duke. I really
believe the duke expected he would have been master of the town before
the day came on which he would be obliged to deliver up the constable,
and then he would not have done it. Besides, if the king had had him
sooner, his majesty would have attempted something more in favour of the
Duke of Lorraine than he did; for the king was informed of his intrigue
with Campobasso. But the king would not engage in the quarrel between
them, though he was not bound by treaty to stand still, and let the Duke
of Burgundy overrun Lorraine. Besides, he had a considerable army upon
the frontiers, but, for several reasons of state, he thought it better to
stand neutral.
The Duke of Burgundy not being able to take Nancy[495] before the day
on which the constable was to be delivered up, and that day being come,
those who were commissioned to deliver him (being the constable’s mortal
enemies), delivered him willingly at the gates of Peronne into the
hands of the Bastard of Bourbon, Admiral of France, and the Lord of St.
Pierre, who conducted him to Paris. I have been since informed by several
persons, that within three hours messengers came post from the duke with
orders to the Lord of Aimeries not to deliver up the constable till after
the taking of Nancy; but they arrived too late. Immediately upon his
arrival at Paris his trial began[496], and the duke sent all his papers
and whatever he thought might be brought in evidence against him. The
king pressed the court to despatch, and persons were appointed to manage
his trial: so that upon the proofs that the King of England had before
given in against him, and those that the Duke of Burgundy now furnished,
the constable was found guilty, condemned, executed, and all his estates
confiscated.
CH. XIII.—A Digression concerning the Duke of Burgundy’s Error in
delivering up the Constable to the King, contrary to the Safe-conduct
which he had given him; and what happened to him afterwards.—1475.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account