The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
Whilst the garrison of Nancy lay in continual expectation of being
relieved, it happened that the above-mentioned Colpin, who commanded
the English troops in the town, was killed by a cannon ball; his death
was a vast prejudice to the Duke of Burgundy’s concerns, for a prince
very often is preserved from great inconveniences by the management
of one single person, provided he has wisdom and valour, although his
extraction be mean; and in this particular I knew no man more careful
than our master, for certainly never prince was more fearful of losing
his men than his majesty. Upon the death of Colpin, the English under
his command began to murmur and despair of relief. They were not aware
of the Duke of Lorraine’s weakness, and that the Duke of Burgundy had
many ways of reinforcing his army; and besides, the English, not having
been abroad for a long time, had but little experience in foreign wars,
and were wholly ignorant in regard to a siege. In short, they mutinied
for a composition, and plainly told the governor, Monsieur de Bievres,
that if he would not consent to a capitulation, they would make one
without him. Though Bievres was a good knight, yet he wanted courage and
resolution. He remonstrated, entreated, and begged of them to have a
little patience; whereas, in my opinion, if he had hectored, and carried
matters with an air of greater authority and resolution, he had succeeded
better; but God had ordered it otherwise: for had they held out but three
days longer, the Duke of Burgundy would have certainly raised the siege.
But, in short, the governor complied with the English, and the town was
surrendered[545] to the Duke of Lorraine, upon condition of saving their
goods and sparing their persons.
The next day, or at furthest two days after the surrender, the Duke of
Burgundy appeared with a very good army, considering his condition,
for several of his own subjects had marched up through the province
of Luxembourg to join him. The Duke of Lorraine and he faced one
another[546], but no action of importance happened between them, the Duke
of Lorraine being too weak to attempt anything. The Duke of Burgundy,
in his old obstinate way, was resolved to besiege Nancy again[547],
though it had been much wiser in him not to have undertaken it at that
time; but when God is pleased to change the fortune of princes, he puts
these obstinate inclinations into them. Had the Duke of Burgundy been
persuaded to have garrisoned the little places about the town, as he was
advised, he would quickly have reduced it to great straits, and would
have forced it to surrender in a short time, for it was but ill provided
with provisions, and the multitude in the town would have presently
distressed it; while he would have had time to recruit his army, and put
them into quarters of refreshment; but he took quite another course.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account