The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII., Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
During these six weeks (or thereabouts) that he lay at La Rivière with
very few troops (nor was it to be wondered at, after the loss of two such
great battles as you have heard before), many declared themselves openly
against him, his friends were grown cold, his subjects were defeated and
rebellious, and began (as is usual) to murmur and contemn their master on
account of his misfortunes. He lost several little towns in Lorraine, as
Vaudemont, Espinal, and others. All the neighbouring states began to make
preparations to invade him; and the vilest and most insignificant of them
were now the most forward in doing him mischief. The Duke of Lorraine
(upon this report) assembled a small body of forces, and besieged
Nancy[540]; the small towns about it were most of them in his possession
already; but the Duke of Burgundy was master of Pont-à-Mousson, about
four leagues off. Amongst those that were besieged in Nancy, there was
a gentleman of the house of Croy, called the Lord of Bievres[541], a
good officer, and a person of honour, whose forces were made up out of
several countries. There was also an Englishman called Colpin, a brave
soldier (though of no great birth), who with other officers belonging to
the garrison of Guynes, had entered the service of the Duke of Burgundy.
This Colpin had the command of about 300 English in the town, and though
they were not pressed either by approaches or batteries[542], they began
to be uneasy at the duke’s slowness in marching to their relief[543]:
and indeed he was highly to blame; for the quarters where he lay were
at so great a distance from Lorraine, that he could do them no service,
and certainly it would have been better for him to have defended what
was left, than to have meditated revenge on the Swiss for what he had
lost. But his perverseness in following no counsel but his own, turned
greatly to his disadvantage; for notwithstanding that he was daily
pressed to relieve that place, yet he continued (without any necessity)
at La Rivière full six weeks; whereas if he had done otherwise, he
might easily have raised the siege of Nancy, for the Duke of Lorraine’s
forces were not numerous[544], and so long as the country of Lorraine
was in his possession, he had free communication between his other
territories (through Luxembourg and Lorraine) into Burgundy; so that if
his intellects had been as right and his judgment as sound as they were
formerly, he would certainly have marched with greater expedition to
their relief.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account