The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
The next prince whom we shall have occasion to mention is Edward IV.,
King of England, a great and powerful monarch. In his minority he saw
his father the Duke of York[171] defeated and slain in battle, and with
him the father[172] of the Earl of Warwick, who governed the king in his
youth, and managed all his affairs; and, to say the truth, it was the
Earl of Warwick who made Edward king, and dethroned his old master, King
Henry VI., who had reigned many years in England, and (in my judgment,
and the judgment of the world,) was the lawful king; but, in such cases,
the disposal of kingdoms and great states is in the hands of God, who
orders them as He pleases, for indeed all things proceed from Him. The
reason of the Earl of Warwick’s espousing the interest of the House of
York against King Henry, who was of the Lancastrian family, was upon a
difference that happened at court betwixt the Duke of Somerset and the
Earl of Warwick. The king not having wisdom enough to compose it, it
grew to that height that the queen[173] (who was of the house of Anjou,
and daughter to René, King of Sicily) interposed in it, and inclined to
the duke’s party against the Earl of Warwick; for all had acknowledged
Henry, his father, and his grandfather, for their lawful kings. The queen
would have acted much more prudently in endeavouring to have adjusted
the dispute between them than in saying, “I am of this party, and will
maintain it;” and it proved so by the event, for it occasioned many
battles in England, and a war which continued nine-and-twenty years[174];
and in the end nearly all the partisans of both sides were destroyed;
so that factions and parties are very perilous and fatal, especially to
the nobility, who are too prone to propagate and foment them. If it be
alleged that by this means both parties are kept in awe, and the secret
minds of his subjects are discovered to the prince, I agree that a young
prince may encourage faction among his ladies, and it may be pleasant and
diverting enough, and may give him opportunity of finding out some of
their intrigues; but nothing is so dangerous to a nation as to nourish
such factions and partialities among men of courage and magnanimity; it
is no less than setting one’s own house on fire; for immediately some or
other cry out, “The king is against us,” seize upon some fortified town,
and correspond with his enemies. And certainly the factions of Orleans
and Burgundy ought to make us wise on this point; for they began a war
which lasted seventy-two years[175], in which the English were concerned,
and thought by those unhappy divisions to have conquered the kingdom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account