The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
But to return from this digression. King Edward was a very young prince,
and one of the handsomest men of his age, at the time he had overcome all
his difficulties; so he gave himself up wholly to pleasures, and took no
delight in anything but ladies, dancing, entertainments, and the chase;
and in this voluptuous course of life, if I mistake not, he spent about
sixteen years, till the quarrel happened between him and the Earl of
Warwick. In which contest, though the king was driven out of the kingdom,
yet his misfortune lasted not long; for he quickly returned, obtained a
victory, and afterwards fell again to his pleasures, and indulged himself
in them more recklessly than before. From this time he feared nobody;
but he grew very fat, and his excess inclining him to diseases, in the
very flower of his age, he died suddenly (as it was reported) of an
apoplexy[176], and his family perished after him (as you have heard), as
regarded the succession in the male line.
In our time also, there reigned two wise and valiant princes, Matthias,
King of Hungary[177], and Mahomet Ottoman, Emperor of the Turks.[178]
This King Matthias was the son of a very valiant gentleman, called the
White Knight of Wallachia[179], a person of great honour and prudence,
who for a long time had governed the kingdom of Hungary, and had gained
several battles over the Turks, who are neighbours to that country, by
reason of the territories which they have usurped in Sclavonia, Bosnia,
and Greece. Not long after his death, Lancelot[180] came to man’s estate,
who was heir to that kingdom, and to the kingdoms of Bohemia and Poland
besides. This Lancelot was advised by some persons (as was reported) to
seize upon the two sons of the White Knight, on the pretence that, as
their father had obtained and exercised so much power and authority in
that kingdom during his infancy, it was not improbable that his sons
might do the same. Upon which the said Lancelot resolved to have them
both apprehended, which was accordingly done. He put the eldest[181] to
death, and sent the other, which was Matthias, a prisoner to Buda, the
chief town in Hungary; but he did not remain long in confinement (God
Almighty being perhaps pleased with the services of his father), for,
awhile after, King Lancelot was poisoned at Prague, in Bohemia, by a lady
of quality (whose brother I have seen), with whom he had been in love,
and she with him; but being incensed at his intended marriage in France,
with the daughter[182] of King Charles VII. (called now the Princess
of Vienne), which was contrary to his engagement to her, she poisoned
him in a bath, by giving him an apple to eat, and conveying poison into
the haft of his knife. Upon the death of Lancelot, the barons of Hungary
assembled at Buda for the election of a king, according to an ancient
privilege which they have, to elect their king when his predecessor has
died without issue. Whilst they were mightily divided, and in great
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account