The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.Commynes, Philippe de
History
The memoirs of Philip de Commines, Lord of Argenton, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b Containing the histories of Louis XI. and Charles VIII. Kings of France, and of Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. To which is added the Scandalous Chronicle, or, secret history of Louis XI., by Jean de Troyes.
Commynes, Philippe de
France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589
accounts.” Clairet urged the matter no farther, but left the money, and
returned his answer to the king, who was highly displeased at his not
bringing a receipt: but he commended and valued the lord chamberlain
above all the King of England’s ministers, ever after paid him his
pension constantly, and never asked for his receipt.
In this posture were affairs between the King of England and our
master: however, the King of England was earnestly solicited and urged
to assist the young princess, and he sent several embassies to our
master to remonstrate with him, and to press him either for a peace,
or a cessation of arms. For some of the privy council of England, and
of the Parliament (which is of the same nature as our three Estates),
were persons of wisdom and penetration, who came out of the country, and
were not pensioners of France like the rest, and these pressed hard,
that the King of England would interpose vigorously for the Princess of
Burgundy; urging, that we did but dissemble with them, and amuse them
with hopes of a marriage, as it very plainly appeared: for at the treaty
at Picquigny[9] the two kings had mutually sworn, that within the space
of a year, the King of England’s daughter should be sent for; but though
the King of France had permitted her to be styled the dauphiness, yet
the time was elapsed, and the lady had not been sent for. But all the
arguments his subjects made use of could not prevail with King Edward,
for several reasons. King Edward was a voluptuous prince, wholly addicted
to his pleasures and ease; and having been, in his former expeditions,
reduced to great straits and necessities, he had no mind to involve
himself in a new war on this side of the water: the fifty thousand
crowns, too, which were punctually paid him in the Tower, softened his
heart, and hindered him from concerning himself in this affair. Besides,
his ambassadors were always bribed, and entertained so nobly, that they
left the French court well satisfied, though the king’s answers were
always uncertain, in order to gain time; for they were always told that
in a few days the king would send ambassadors of his own, who would
satisfy their master in every point which had been left in doubt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account