Nay, how (he answered) should that be, for how could they all have come together from the ends of the earth? and even if they had so done, men are not all of one speech? (34) (34) Or, "there would be difficulty of understanding each other, and a babel of tongues." Soc. Whom then do you believe to have been the makers of these laws. Hipp. For my part, I think that the gods must have made these laws for men, and I take it as proof that first and foremost it is a law and custom everywhere to worship and reverence the gods. Soc. And, I presume, to honour parents is also customary everywhere? Yes, that too (he answered). Soc. And, I presume, also the prohibition of intermarriage between parents and children? Hipp. No; at that point I stop, Socrates. That does not seem to me to be a law of God. Now, why? (he asked). Because I perceive it is not infrequently transgressed (he answered). (35) (35) Or, "as I perceive, it is not of universal application, some transgress it." Soc. Well, but there are a good many other things which people do contrary to law; only the penalty, I take it, affixed to the transgression of the divine code is certain; there is no escape for the offender after the manner in which a man may transgress the laws of man with impunity, slipping through the fingers of justice by stealth, or avoiding it by violence. Hipp. And what is the inevitable penalty paid by those who, being related as parents and children, intermingle in marriage? Soc. The greatest of all penalties; for what worse calamity can human beings suffer in the production of offspring than to misbeget? (36) (36) Or, "in the propagation of the species than to produce misbegotten children." Hipp. But how or why should they breed them ill where nothing hinders them, being of a good stock themselves and producing from stock as good? Soc. Because, forsooth, in order to produce good children, it is not simply necessary that the parents should be good and of a good stock, but that both should be equally in the prime and vigour of their bodies. (37) Do you suppose that the seed of those who are at their prime is like theirs who either have not yet reached their prime, or whose prime has passed? (37) Cf. Plat. "Laws," viii. 839 A; Herbst, etc., cf. Grotius, "de Jure," ii. 5, xii. 4. Hipp. No, it is reasonable to expect that the seed will differ. Soc. And for the better--which? Hipp. Theirs clearly who are at their prime. Soc. It would seem that the seed of those who are not yet in their prime or have passed their prime is not good? Hipp. It seems most improbable it should be. Soc. Then the right way to produce children is not that way? Hipp. No, that is not the right way. Soc. Then children who are so produced are produced not as they ought to be? Hipp. So it appears to me. What offspring then (he asked) will be ill produced, ill begotten, and ill born, if not these? I subscribe to that opinion also (replied Hippias).