The Mentor: Chinese Rugs, Vol. 4, Num. 2, Serial No. 102, March 1, 1916Mumford, John Kimberly
History
The Mentor: Chinese Rugs, Vol. 4, Num. 2, Serial No. 102, March 1, 1916
Mumford, John Kimberly
Rugs, Oriental
[Illustration: A VERY AMBITIOUS DESIGN
The garden idea is apparent. The deer, stork, tree, and cotyledon (seed
leaf) forms are of the “Shou” order suggestive of long life. The round
fret forms at the corners likewise symbolize this]
The art of China, as expressed in porcelain and in painting, took hold
upon the fancy of the West long ago: witness the Delft ware, which of
course owes its inspiration to Chinese sources. Europe had a passable
notion of Chinese artistic tenets at a rather early period. So,
relatively, had America. It is interesting to note that of the Chinese
rugs, now so amazingly popular in this country, practically nothing was
known until fifteen or twenty years ago, save to an exceedingly small
number of people. The period of their predominance in popular favor has
been brief; but already the supply of old pieces with real merit is
exhausted, particularly in the larger sizes.
SUDDEN POPULARITY
The vogue of the Chinese rug in this country is unquestionably due to
the artistic sense and discernment of the late Stanford White. In a
certain establishment in New York there had grown up an accumulation
of old Chinese pieces, some of them very rare and beautiful, which had
been “thrown in” with other art objects purchased. They begged for
attention at thirty or forty dollars each, until Mr. White placed one
or two of them in the hall of the late William C. Whitney’s house. From
that moment the demand for them, and consequently their market value,
advanced at a prodigious rate.
No matter what anybody may claim, it is doubtful if there has ever been
in Europe or America any definite or systematized knowledge of the
locality of origin or the period of Chinese rugs. Aside from the small
importance usually attached to them as art products by the Chinese
themselves, this dearth of specific knowledge has been due to the fact
that the rugs were not woven in Eastern China, but in the interior
provinces, and, even after a demand arose for them in the West, buyers
were well content to await arrivals in the Treaty Ports, rather than
court the perils of travel into the Chinese _hinterland_. It was
believed that as soon as the demand became known there would be great
influx of desirable fabrics to Peking. There was; but it lasted only
for a little space, and today in the Chinese capital a rug of any merit
whatsoever commands a price almost prohibitive. This has led to a great
volume of manufacture in Peking, both in new designs and in more or
less creditable copies of the old. But so violently has this commercial
production been promoted that the very multitude of modern Chinese rugs
has begun to work injury to the enterprise; although the texture of the
new rugs is finer than that in many of the old ones. In fact, Chinese
rug weaving as a whole does not show any impressively high measure of
technical accomplishment.
TEXTURE OF CHINESE RUGS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account