The Mentor: The Revolution, Vol. 1, Num. 43, Serial No. 43: The Story of America in PicturesHart, Albert Bushnell
History
The Mentor: The Revolution, Vol. 1, Num. 43, Serial No. 43: The Story of America in Pictures
Hart, Albert Bushnell
United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
Then why revolt, especially when above a third of the thinking people
in America were opposed to the Revolution, and had to be driven out
or silenced? To the original grievances of the Revolution was added a
stupid John Bull obstinacy, concentrated in George III, but shared by
a good part of the British nation. These mistakes made by England are
a fine example of what comes to a country that falls into the hands of
what are called the “Interests”; for Parliament was really nothing but
a combine of great titled families, who took in some representatives
of the cities and the merchant class. One of the best results of the
Revolution was that it shook up the British aristocracy; and the best
proof that the Revolution was right is the admission of Lord North,
when the war was all over, that it had been a great mistake, but that
the nation had made it, and not simply the prime minister.
The Revolution was worth all the blood and treasure that it cost,
because it lighted a new torch of popular government. There had been
plenty of government of the people in ancient and medieval times;
but at the epoch of the American Revolution the formerly democratic
Swiss and Dutch, and the free citizens of the German and French and
Spanish cities, had lost faith in themselves. It was fashionable to
revere Demosthenes and Cato and Brutus and the _Populus Romanus_; but
real republican government had about ceased on the earth when the new
constellation of the United States appeared on the horizon.
The colonies had very tidy little governments, schools of politics,
in which the speaker of the assembly was commonly the leader of a
healthy opposition to the governor; and on that foundation they built
tidy little state governments, which showed the prevalent belief that
governors were dangerous creatures who ought to have as little power
as possible; while legislatures were a reflection of the people’s will
which could not err. The wheel of revolution has twirled backward in
our day; for we make governors and presidents great political leaders,
and set our legislators on a one-legged race against the initiative
and referendum. In the midst of the confusion of the Revolution,
when town after town was picked up by the British, and nobody knew
whether the Revolution would win out, it is wonderful how well the
state governments worked, and how successful they were in putting on
record the great principle of the two kinds of law,--fundamental or
constitutional law, and statute law.
[Illustration: PATRICK HENRY ADDRESSING THE VIRGINIA ASSEMBLY IN 1765.
He is famous for his speech supporting the resolutions to resist the
Stamp Act. At one point he exclaimed, “Caesar had his Brutus, Charles
the First his Cromwell, and George the Third”--“Treason! treason!”
shouted the Speaker of the Assembly, “Treason! treason!” shouted the
members--“and,” Henry continued, “George the Third may profit by their
example. If this be treason, make the most of it!”]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account