The Messiah of the CylinderEmanuel, V. R. (Victor Rousseau)
Philosophy
The Messiah of the Cylinder
Emanuel, V. R. (Victor Rousseau)
Science fiction
He was a Christian, and he took the ground that democracy, in itself
bad, had become impossible when the atheistic deism of the eighteenth
century pervaded the minds of the voting masses and took the form of
Hæckel’s materialism and that of his school of thinkers.
He claimed that, so far from indicating the spread of enlightenment, it
was due to national decay, and had always preceded periods of national
reconstruction, instancing Rome and Athens, and the America of a century
ago, where democracy had become incompatible with free speech and
assembly, an independent judiciary, and a broad and secure freedom.
Written for circulation among those opposed to the Sanson régime, it was
a fervent prayer for the deliverance of the world. In it I gathered more
of the meaning of the new civilization than I had learned from David.
I read that the War of the Nations was caused by one thing alone: the
breaking down of Christianity in Germany, and the revival of the old
pagan doctrines, with the ensuing challenge against all that humanity
had built up during two thousand years.
But in that period of ferments only a few had seen this meaning. The
challenge had been interpreted as one of aristocracy against democracy,
largely because democracy, then in the saddle, was the creed of the
loudest publicists. For this the writer Wells, known posthumously as
“The Prophet,” a man whose penetrating judgment and synthetic mind were
fogged by class consciousness, was largely responsible.
The hope of democracy was fair in those after-years, when nations,
purged by their ordeal of blood, revived the noble hopes of liberty. Men
would have sacrificed everything for their brethren during that first
decade of peace. There was a splendid spiritual awakening among the
nations. Democracy was the young, smiling god, the guardian of universal
peace.
If only, the writer said, that spiritual enlargement had been joined to
Christian faith. But the backwash of nineteenth century atheism swamped
it. The doctrines of materialism were rooted in the masses. The German
virus could not be rooted out without trained leadership and ideals. I
recalled Sir Spofforth’s words when I read that. “It must not happen
again!” all men had said, when at last peace triumphed. No, not if the
spirit of Christ, governing all men, had drawn them into brotherhood.
But what if insults had been heaped upon the German people? What hope of
peace was there when hate such as this ruled in the mind of the leader
of the new faith?
Instead of Christ, these blind philosophers set up their democratic god.
They labelled war “dynastic,” and believed democracy would destroy it.
Had they not used their eyes? Did they not know that war was the
embodiment of hate? Had they never looked on a mob, shouting for war, or
was human nature to be changed by education, and through prosperity, so
that no nation would ever again gather to itself false doctrines, with
hate, and scorn, and pride, and go forth to destroy?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account