The Microscope. Its History, Construction, and Application 15th ed.: Being a familiar introduction to the use of the instrument, and the study of microscopical scienceHogg, Jabez
History
The Microscope. Its History, Construction, and Application 15th ed.: Being a familiar introduction to the use of the instrument, and the study of microscopical science
Hogg, Jabez
Microscopy; Natural history
The effect described, that of projecting the blue image beyond the red,
over-correcting the object-glass as to colour, is purposely produced;
it is also seen that the images _b b_ and _r r_ are curved in the wrong
direction to be seen distinctly by the convex eye-lens; this then is a
further defect of the compound microscope made up of two lenses. But
the field-glass, at the same time that it bends the rays and converges
them to foci at _b′ b′_ and _r′ r′_, also reverses the curvature of the
images as here shown, giving them the form best adapted for distinct
vision by the eye-glass _e e_. The field-glass has at the same time
brought the blue and red images closer together, so that they produce
an almost colourless image to the eye. The chromatic aberration of
lenses has been clearly explained in a previous chapter. But let it
be supposed that the object-glass had not been over-corrected, that
it had been perfectly achromatic; the rays would then have appeared
coloured as soon as they had passed the field-glass; the blue rays
of the central pencil, for example, would converge at _b′′_, and the
red rays at _r′′_, which is just the reverse of what is required of
the eye-lens; for as its blue focus is also shorter than its red, it
would require that the blue image should be at _r′′_, and the red at
_b′′_. This effect is due to over-correction of the object-glass,
which removes the blue foci _b b_ as much beyond the red foci _r
r_ as the sum of the distances between the red and the blue foci of
the field-lens and eye-lens; so that the separation _b r_ is exactly
taken up in passing through those two lenses, and the several colours
coincide, so far as focal distance is concerned, as the rays pass the
eye-lens. So that while they coincide as to distance, they differ in
another respect--the blue image is rendered smaller than the red by
the greater refractive power of the field-glass upon the former. In
tracing the pencil _l_, for instance, it will be noticed that, after
passing the field-glass, two sets of lines are drawn, one whole and
one dotted, the former representing the red, and the latter the blue
rays. This accidental effect in the Huyghenian eye-piece was pointed
out by Boscovich. The separation into colours of the field-glass is
like the over-correction of the object-glass--and opens the way to
its complete correction. If the differently-coloured rays were kept
together till they reached the eye-glass, they would still be coloured,
and present coloured images to the eye. The separating effected by the
field-glass causes the blue rays to fall so much nearer the centre of
the eye-glass, where, owing to its spherical figure, the refractive
power is less than at the margin, so that spherical error of the
eye-lens may be said to constitute a nearly equal balance to the
chromatic dispersion of the field-lens, and the blue and red rays _l′_
and _l′′_ emerge nearly parallel, presenting a fairly good definition
of a single point to the eye.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account