The Cambridge MS., as has been already stated, combines portions of both
the A and the B version with several independent stanzas. At first sight
it might appear to represent a transitional stage in the development of
the B from the A type, but closer examination shows that this is not the
case, and that the text is merely a later compilation from the two. The
writer must have had some knowledge both of the longer A version
represented by MS. Harl. 913, and of the common seven-stanza B type, and
seems to have tried to combine his recollections in one poem, halting
between the four-lined and six-lined stanza, repeating himself here and
there, and adding certain new verses of his own. There is no grouping
into stanzas in the MS., but a division is easily made by the rimes, and
these give mono-rimed stanzas of four lines chiefly, with one of six
lines, and some fragmentary ones of two or three. In one case a stanza
has been broken up and the two couplets inserted at different points
(ll. 9-10, 27-28). As has been shown in the table of MSS. of the B
version, six verses of the B type may be traced, while four verses show
distinct correspondence with A, and eleven are independent of either.
A comparison of the similar lines follows:--
(_MS. Cambr._ Ii. 4. 9) ll. 1-4.
Erthe vpon erthe is waxin & wrought,
Erthe takys on erthe a nobylay of nought;
Now erthe vpon erthe layes all his þought
How erthe vpon erthe sattys all at noght.
(_MS. Harl._ 4486.) B Version.
1 Erthe owte of erthe is wonderly wrowghte,
Erthe of the erthe hathe gete an abbey[12] of nawte,
Erthe apon erthe hath sett{e} al his thowghte
How erthe apon erthe may be hye browte.
ll. 9-10, 27-28.
Erthe vpon erth wolde be a kyng,
But howe erth xal to erth thynkyth he no thyng.
When erthe says to erth: ‘My rent þou me bryng,’
Then has erth fro erthe a dolfull p{ar}tyng.
2 Erthe apon erthe be he a kyng{e},
Butt how erth schall{e} to erthe thynketh{e} he nothyng{e}.
When erthe byddeth erthe his rent home bryng{e},
Then schall{e} erth{e} owte of erthe haue a pyteous[13]
p{ar}tyng{e}.
ll. 5-8.
Erthe vpon erth has hallys & towr{is};
Erthe says to erth: ‘This is alle owr{is}.’
But q{ua}n erth vpon erth has byg{g}yd his bowr{is}
Than xal erth for the erth haue scharpe schowr{is}.
3 Erthe apon erthe wynneth castell{es} & towres.
Then seyth{e} erthe to erthe: ‘These byth{e} all{e} owres.’
When erthe apon erthe hath bygged{e} vp his bowres
Then schall{e} erthe for the erthe suffre scharpe schowres.
Cf. l. 66.
If erth haue mys don, he getyth scharpe sho{u}rs.
ll. 33-35.
Erthe wrotys in erth as molys don in molde,
Erthe vpon erth glydys as golde,
As erthe leve in erthe eu{e}r mor{e} schulde.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account