The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
Then, as the tomb became larger, to accommodate the more abundant
offerings, almost every conceivable device was tried to protect the body
from such contact. Instead of the goat-skin or matting, in many cases the
same result was obtained by lining the grave with series of sticks, with
slabs of wood, with pieces of unhewn stone, or by lining the grave with
mud-bricks. In other cases, again, large pottery coffins, of an oblong,
elliptical, or circular form, were used. Later on, when metal implements
were invented (=90=), and the skill to use them created the crafts of
the carpenter and stonemason, coffins of wood or stone came into vogue.
It is quite certain that the coffin and sarcophagus were Egyptian
inventions. The mere fact of this extraordinary variety of means and
materials employed in Egypt, when in other countries one definite method
was adopted, is proof of the most positive kind that these measures
for lining the grave were actually invented in Egypt. For the inventor
tries experiments: the borrower imitates one definite thing. During this
process of gradual evolution, which occupied the whole of the Pre- and
Proto-dynastic periods, the practice of inhumation (in the strict sense
of the term) changed step by step into one of burial in a tomb. In other
words, instead of burial in the soil, the body came to be lodged in a
carefully constructed subterranean chamber, which no longer was filled
up with earth. The further stages in this process of evolution of tomb
construction, the way in which the rock-cut tomb came into existence,
and the gradual development of the stone superstructure and temple of
offerings—all of these matters have been summarised in some detail in my
article on the evolution of megalithic monuments (=94=).
What especially I want to emphasize here is that in Egypt is preserved
every stage in the gradual transformation of the burial customs from
simple inhumation into that associated with the fully-developed rock-cut
tomb and the stone temple. There can be no question that the craft of the
stonemason and the practice of building megalithic monuments originated
in Egypt. In addition, I want to make it quite clear that there is the
most intimate genetic relationship between the development of these
megalithic practices and the origin of the art of mummification.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account