The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
As in the history of every similar happening elsewhere, necessity, or
what these simple-minded people believed to be a necessity, was the
“mother of invention.”
In the course of the following discussion it will be seen that the
practice of mummification became linked up in another way with what
may be called the megalithic traditions. The crudely-preserved body no
longer retained any likeness to the person as his friends knew him when
alive. A life-like stone statue was therefore made to represent him.
Magical means (p. 42) were adopted to give life to the statue. Thus
originated the belief that a stone might become the dwelling of a living
person; and that a person when dead may become converted into stone. So
insistent did this belief become that among more uncultured people, who
borrowed Egyptian practices but were unable to make portrait statues, a
rudely-shaped or even unhewn pillar of stone came to be regarded as the
dwelling of the deceased.
Thus from being the mere device for the identification of the deceased
the stone statue degenerated among less cultured people into an object
even less like the dead man than his own crudely-made mummy. But the
fundamental idea remained and became the starting point for that rich
crop of petrifaction-myths and beliefs concerning men and animals living
in stones.
Thus arose in Egypt, somewhere about 3000 B.C., the nucleus of the
“heliolithic” culture-complex—mummification, megalithic architecture,
and the making of idols, three practices most intimately and genetically
linked one with the other. But it was the merest accident that the people
amongst whom these customs developed, should also have been weavers
of linen, workers in copper, worshippers of the sun and serpent, and
practitioners of massage and circumcision.
But it was not for another fifteen centuries that the characteristic
“heliolithic” culture-complex was completed by the addition of numerous
other trivial customs, like ear-piercing, tattooing and the use of the
swastika, none of which originated in Egypt, but happened to have become
“tacked on” to that distinctive culture before its great world tour began.
The earliest unquestionable evidence (=89=) of an attempt artificially
to preserve the body was found in a rock-cut tomb of the Second Dynasty,
at Sakkara. It is important to note that the body was lying in a _flexed_
position upon the left side, and was contained in a short wooden coffin,
modelled like a house. The limbs were wrapped separately and large
quantities of fine linen bandages had been applied around all parts of
the body, so as to mould the wrapped mummy to a life-like form.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account