The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
I have already indicated how, out of the conception of the possibility of
bringing to life the stone portrait-statue, a series of curious customs
were developed. Among peoples on a lower cultural plane, who were less
skilled than the Egyptians in stone-carving, the making of a life-like
statue was beyond their powers. Sometimes they made the attempt to
represent the human form; in other cases crude representations of the
breasts or suggestions of the genitalia were the only signs on a stone
pillar to indicate that it was meant to represent a human statue: in many
cases a simple uncarved block of stone was set up. But the idea that
such a pillar, whether carved or not, was the dwelling of some deceased
person, seized the imagination and spread far and wide. It is seen in
the Pygmalion and Galatea story, and its converse in the tragic history
of Lot’s wife. It is found throughout the Mediterranean area, the whole
littoral of Southern Asia, Indonesia, the Pacific Islands and America,
and can be regarded as definite evidence of the influence of the cult
that developed in association with the practice of mummification.
It is necessary to emphasise that the making of portrait-statues was an
outcome of the practice of mummification and an integral part of the
cult associated with that burial custom. Hartland falls into grave error
when he writes “where other peoples set up images of the deceased, those
who practised desiccation or embalmment were enabled to keep the bodies
themselves” (=32=, p. 418). It was precisely the people who embalmed or
preserved the bodies of their dead who also made statues of them.
As these stones, according to such beliefs, could be made to hear and
speak (=23=), they naturally became oracles. People were able to commune
with and get advice and instruction from the kings and wise men who dwelt
within these stone pillars. Thus it became the custom in many lands for
meetings of special solemnity, such as those where important decisions
had to be made, to be held at stone circles, where the members of the
convention sat on the stones and communed with their ancestors, former
rulers or wise men, who dwelt in the stones (or the grave) in the centre
of the circle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account