The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs — John Shaqi
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
At the very earliest period in Egypt from which historical records have
come down to us (the time of the First Dynasty, 3200 B.C., or even
earlier) “the king’s favourite title was ‘Horus,’ by which he identified
himself as the successor of the great god [the hawk sun-god] who had once
ruled over the kingdom ... [other symbols often appeared] side by side
with Buto, the serpent-goddess of the northern capital. As [the king]
felt himself still as primarily king of Upper Egypt, it was not until
later that he wore the serpent of the North, the sacred uraeus, upon his
forehead.” (Breasted, =6=, p. 38). “The sun-disc, with the outspread
wings of the hawk, became the commonest symbol of their religion” (p.
54). But in the time of the Fourth Dynasty “the priests of Heliopolis now
demanded that [the king, who had always been represented as the successor
of the sun-god and had borne the title ‘Horus’] be the bodily son of Ré,
who henceforth would appear on earth to become the father of the Pharaoh”
(p. 122).
Now, when the Pharaoh thus became identified with the great sun-god Ré,
his Pyramid-temple became the place of worship of the sun-god. Megalithic
architecture thus became indissolubly connected with sun-worship,
simply from the accident of the invention of the art of building in
stone—of erecting stone tombs, which were also temples of offerings—by a
people who happened to be sun-worshippers and whose ruler’s tomb became
the shrine of the sun-god. I have already explained the close genetic
connection between the practice of mummification and megalithic building.
The fact that the dominance of the sun-god Ré was attained in the
northern capital, which was also the seat of serpent-worship, led to the
association of the sun and the serpent.[9] From this purely fortuitous
blending of the sun’s disc with the uraeus, often combined, especially
in later times, with the wings of the Horus-hawk, a symbolism came into
being which was destined to spread until it encircled the world, from
Ireland to America. For an excellent example of this composite symbolism
from America see Bancroft, (=3=), Vol. IV., p. 351. A more striking
illustration of the completeness of the transference of a complex and
wholly artificial design from Ancient Egypt to America could not be
imagined. [For the full discussion of the original association of the sun
and the serpent see Sethe’s important _Memoir_ (=74=).]
The chance circumstances which led to the linking together of all these
incongruous elements—mummification, megalithic architecture, the idea
of the king as son of the sun, sun and serpent worship and its curious
symbolism—were created in Egypt, so that, wherever these peculiar customs
or traditions make their appearance elsewhere in association the one with
the other, it can confidently be regarded as a sure token of Egyptian
influence, exerted directly or indirectly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account